2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.physb.2003.08.090
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exchange energy formulations for 3D micromagnetics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further discussions regarding the dependence of micromagnetic simulation results on cell size may be found elsewhere. 27,28 The change in relative energy error as cell size reduces well below the exchange length is generally not significant compared to the increase in the required computation time. Details on doing micromagnetic simulations with OOMMF may be found elsewhere.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further discussions regarding the dependence of micromagnetic simulation results on cell size may be found elsewhere. 27,28 The change in relative energy error as cell size reduces well below the exchange length is generally not significant compared to the increase in the required computation time. Details on doing micromagnetic simulations with OOMMF may be found elsewhere.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nm case was simulated with 5 nm and 2 nm cubic cells, while the nm case was simulated with 2 nm and 1 nm cubic cells. It is noted that all cell sizes are less than the magnetostatic exchange length, nm ( in meters and SI units for soft magnetic material [17]). The appendage width for elements of , and nm increased or decreased slightly off dimension when the shape's image was imported in order to fill or unfill whole cells.…”
Section: Micromagnetic Computer Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…H exch , the effective field due to the exchange interaction is commonly implemented using a six‐neighbor formulation : H(i,j,k)=2AΔ2(m(i+1,j,k)+m(i1,j,k)+m(i,j+1,k)+m(i,j1,k)+m(i,j,k+1)+m(i,j,k1)6m(i,j,k))where A is the exchange stiffness and Δ the finite difference discretization length. This formula could be efficiently implemented on the GPU using the methods described in .…”
Section: Effective Field Computationmentioning
confidence: 99%