2013
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.88.054414
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exchange interactions in paramagnetic amorphous and disordered crystallineCrN-based systems

Abstract: We present a first principles supercell methodology for the calculation of exchange interactions of magnetic materials with arbitrary degrees of structural and chemical disorder in their high temperature paramagnetic state. It is based on a projection of the total magnetic energy of the system onto local pair clusters, allowing the interactions to vary independently as a response to their local environments. We demonstrate our method by deriving the distance dependent exchange interactions in vibrating crystal… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A model of the complete disorder, however, is applicable if the temperature of the system (T ) is much higher than the strongest interaction J max ij of the classical Heisenberg Hamiltonian (T J max ij ). For CrN, the calculated exchange interactions [55] are found to be of the order of 150 K for realistic lattice displacements obtained from MD and it is only for the largest displacements that they get close to 300 K. This means that for CrN, T = 300 K is indeed larger than J max ij ∼ 150 K and we can confidently consider CrN to be in its PM state at 300 K and treat it within DLM-MD already at this temperature. We note that the temperature T as used in this article thus refers to the temperature of the atoms and not that of the magnetic subsystem.…”
Section: B Details Of Dlm-md Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A model of the complete disorder, however, is applicable if the temperature of the system (T ) is much higher than the strongest interaction J max ij of the classical Heisenberg Hamiltonian (T J max ij ). For CrN, the calculated exchange interactions [55] are found to be of the order of 150 K for realistic lattice displacements obtained from MD and it is only for the largest displacements that they get close to 300 K. This means that for CrN, T = 300 K is indeed larger than J max ij ∼ 150 K and we can confidently consider CrN to be in its PM state at 300 K and treat it within DLM-MD already at this temperature. We note that the temperature T as used in this article thus refers to the temperature of the atoms and not that of the magnetic subsystem.…”
Section: B Details Of Dlm-md Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The other elastic constants (in GPa) are C 22 = C 11 = 659,C 33 = 616,C 13 = C 23 = 93,C 44 = C 55 = 144, and C 66 = 154, respectively. The relatively small difference between AFM and PM calculations can be attributed to relatively weak magnetic exchange interactions in B1 CrN [55]. One should expect a substantially larger effect in systems with higher Néel or Curie temperature.…”
Section: A Single-crystal Elastic Constantsmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The focus is instead of finding possible magnetic ground-state configurations using a Heisenberg Hamiltonian H = − (i = j )J ij e i · e j , where J ij is the MEI between pairs of super-moments (i, j ), with unit vectors e i and e j along the local magnetic moment at site i and j, represented by a chain of super-moments. We derived the exchange interactions J ij , i.e., MEI, between the supermoments of the Heisenberg Hamiltonian for the first four supermoment interlayer coordination shells at various volumes, by using the magnetic Connolly-Williams structure inversion method [62,63] in combination with energyvolume data. The volume dependence J ij is displayed in Fig.…”
Section: Heisenberg Monte Carlo Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The magnetic direct cluster averaging method (MDCA), described in detail in paper IV, is a direct adaptation of DCA by Lindmaa et al, who used it to treat magnetism in chemically and topologically disordered phases [58]. In such phases, the signs and magnitudes of the exchange interactions may vary significantly even between pairs of atoms that would be equivalent in the ideal crystal lattice, due differences in the chemical environment or spatial separation.…”
Section: Magnetic Exchange Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%