2014
DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyu081
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exchangeability in the case-crossover design

Abstract: In cohort and case-control studies, confounding that arises as a result of differences in the distribution of determinants of the outcome between exposure groups leading to non-exchangeability are addressed by restriction, matching or with statistical models. In case-only studies, this issue is addressed by comparing each individual with his/herself. Although case-only designs use self-matching and only include individuals who develop the outcome of interest, issues of non-exchangeability are identical to thos… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
130
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(130 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
130
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Case-crossover design is analogous to a matched retrospective case-control design in which only matched pairs that are discordant for exposure contribute to the information [18][19][20]. As case-crossover design is a self-matched design [18][19][20][21], therefore we did not require adjusting for the independent risk factors which are unchanged within a person such as Body Mass Index (BMI), age, sex.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Case-crossover design is analogous to a matched retrospective case-control design in which only matched pairs that are discordant for exposure contribute to the information [18][19][20]. As case-crossover design is a self-matched design [18][19][20][21], therefore we did not require adjusting for the independent risk factors which are unchanged within a person such as Body Mass Index (BMI), age, sex.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a case-crossover design, selfmatching of each participant eliminates bias in control selection and self-confounding removes confounding effects of factors that are constant over time within individuals but differ among study participants (e.g. age, genetics, race, education) [18][19][20][21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations