2008
DOI: 10.1007/s11104-008-9723-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exchangeability of orthophosphate and pyrophosphate in soils: a double isotopic labelling study

Abstract: Liquid polyphosphate fertilisers have shown advantages in field experiments as a phosphorus (P) source for crops grown on calcareous soils. Polyphosphate fertilisers contain orthophosphate (oP), pyrophosphate (pP) and other condensed P species. A double labelling technique was developed using ion chromatography for separation of oP and pP, the major P species in polyphosphate fertilisers, in order to measure the isotopically exchangeable oP, pP and hydrolysed pP. Isotopically exchangeable P was measured in soi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
16
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This is supported by previous results, where HMP in solution proved to almost completely (80%) bioavailable compared to KH2PO4 (Bollyn et al 2017). The presence of soil-borne microorganisms likely speeds up the hydrolysis, making HMP as bioavailable as KH2PO4, a result that was previously found for other polyphosphates (Dick 1985;McBeath et al 2009). To better understand the critical soil parameters that affect the stability of added P-loaded nanoparticles and native colloids, a fate study was set up in Part II examining the pore water composition under varying conditions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…This is supported by previous results, where HMP in solution proved to almost completely (80%) bioavailable compared to KH2PO4 (Bollyn et al 2017). The presence of soil-borne microorganisms likely speeds up the hydrolysis, making HMP as bioavailable as KH2PO4, a result that was previously found for other polyphosphates (Dick 1985;McBeath et al 2009). To better understand the critical soil parameters that affect the stability of added P-loaded nanoparticles and native colloids, a fate study was set up in Part II examining the pore water composition under varying conditions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…12 All treatments were spiked with radioactive 33 P at a dose of 10 Bq mL −1 nutrient solution, so each pot received a total dose of 1.9 kBq. Colloidal stock suspensions were made by mixing different components in the following order under continuous stirring: water, colloid, NOM/HMP/IHP, P i , and 33 P i . The time between addition of stable and radioactive P never exceeded 1 min; this stock suspension was then added to aerated nutrient solutions to obtain the correct end concentration and equilibrated for at least 1 h before transplanting the seedlings.…”
Section: ■ Materials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S7). How quickly the conversion of PP to OP proceeds in the field depends on environmental conditions such as temperature, soil type, P concentration, and pH (Dick and Tabatabai, 1986;McBeath et al, 2006;McBeath et al, 2009). One concern often raised is that because PP must go through this hydrolysis step for the nutrient to become useful to plants, early season growth may be compromised when this reaction is slow (McBeath et al, 2006).…”
Section: Diffusion Of P Addedmentioning
confidence: 99%