2018
DOI: 10.1007/s13165-018-0238-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exchanging knowledge to improve organic arable farming: an evaluation of knowledge exchange tools with farmer groups across Europe

Abstract: Organic farming is knowledge intensive. To support farmers in improve yields and organic agriculture systems, there is a need to improve how knowledge is shared. There is an established culture of sharing ideas, successes and failures in farming. The internet and information technologies open-up new opportunities for knowledge exchange involving farmers, researchers, advisors and other practitioners. The OK-Net Arable brought together practitioners from regional Farmer Innovation Groups across Europe in a mult… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this way, farmers benefit from the digital 'social capital' [59], i.e., knowledge of the digital expert network, cf. [55,60,61].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this way, farmers benefit from the digital 'social capital' [59], i.e., knowledge of the digital expert network, cf. [55,60,61].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Digital resources can become a key tool to overcome the language barrier [49]. Online multilingual platforms, such as the Organic Farm Knowledge platform (https://organic-farmknowledge.org/, accessed on 28 December 2021), can provide access to high-quality and trusted digital learning resources on organic agriculture to farmers from different countries [50]. Exploiting internet-based translation services (e.g., Google Translator or DeepL) can also help, though the technical vocabulary can be more difficult to be correctly translated automatically.…”
Section: Knowledge Network' Structure and Compositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, short videos contain less information. The study of Bliss et al [22] highlighted that short videos may fail to provide enough detail to encourage practical application. Furthermore, due to their relatively fast-paced nature, the details may not be grasped [40].…”
Section: Video Lengthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More generally, even though videos are successful tools to exchange knowledge, it remains fundamental to combine them with more "traditional" ways of knowledge exchange (e.g., physical meetings). Videos should never be used as an exclusive tool, and the combination of both ways of exchanging knowledge is the most likely way to encourage farmers to translate knowledge into action [22]. TNs are already successfully promoting face-to-face exchange moments.…”
Section: Communication and Dissemination Channel Through Knowledge Pl...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation