2010
DOI: 10.1007/s11845-010-0532-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Excision and primary closure of pilonidal sinus disease: worthwhile option with an acceptable recurrence rate

Abstract: Excision and primary closure of chronic pilonidal sinus has low recurrence rate with early return to activities. Primary closure appears to be a cost-effective option for uncomplicated pilonidal sinus disease.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Partial wound dehiscence was encountered in 9.2% and 9% of patients in group PC and group LF, respectively. This compares well with the published series [17,19,23]. In addition, all of our patients experiencing complications were improved completely with antibiotics, simple drainage and daily dressing.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Partial wound dehiscence was encountered in 9.2% and 9% of patients in group PC and group LF, respectively. This compares well with the published series [17,19,23]. In addition, all of our patients experiencing complications were improved completely with antibiotics, simple drainage and daily dressing.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The main aim of primary closure is rapid healing. But different recurrence rates (9 to 25%) have been reported after primary closure [16,17]. A meta-analysis comparing healing by primary closure and open healing after surgery for PD showed that recurrence was less likely to occur after open healing [18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conservative methods such as phenol injection, laser epilation, and shaving are used in the early stages of PSD with different success rates [8][9][10]. Surgical methods including primary closure, marsupialization, the Limberg flap, and cleft closure [11][12][13][14][15] have also been performed for treating PSD; however, there is no current agreement as to what the ideal treatment is. The preferred operation for PSD should be simple, cost-effective, and associated with minimal pain and postoperative complications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[11121314] The main problems with the primary closure technique appear to be high-recurrence rate and high-infection rate. [4] On the other hand, patients generally complain about open-packing or marsupialization methods because of painful wound management and dressing changes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5791524] Postoperative esthetic satisfaction has been reported to be higher in patients with simplified closures, an advantage that appears to be due to the simplified technique itself, rather than due to differences in rates of wound infection or recurrence. [13] Avoiding flap reconstruction, the most involved aspect of the surgery can also reduce surgery time and complexity. [7] The cosmetic result was better in patients with simple closure and the flap construction turned out worst while neither wound infection nor recurrence had any influence on the cosmetic result.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%