2015
DOI: 10.1242/dev.121202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Excitability governs neural development in a hippocampal region specific manner

Abstract: Neuronal activity, including intrinsic neuronal excitability and synaptic transmission, is an essential regulator of brain development. However, how the intrinsic neuronal excitability of distinct neurons affects their integration into developing circuits remains poorly understood. To investigate this problem, we created several transgenic mouse lines in which intrinsic excitability is suppressed, and the neurons are effectively silenced, in different excitatory neuronal populations of the hippocampus. Here we… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here we show that PPA affects the much smaller part of the hippocampus, while the prefrontal cortex retained almost normal ultrastructure. It is also notable that during adolescence, molecular composition and synaptic function of both regions still undergo developmental modifications, indicating to a high level of neuroplasticity of these areas in response to physiological and pathological conditions (Counotte et al, 2010;Gómez & Edgin, 2016;Johnson-Venkatesh, Khan, Murphy, Sutton, & Umemori, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here we show that PPA affects the much smaller part of the hippocampus, while the prefrontal cortex retained almost normal ultrastructure. It is also notable that during adolescence, molecular composition and synaptic function of both regions still undergo developmental modifications, indicating to a high level of neuroplasticity of these areas in response to physiological and pathological conditions (Counotte et al, 2010;Gómez & Edgin, 2016;Johnson-Venkatesh, Khan, Murphy, Sutton, & Umemori, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…; Johnson‐Venkatesh et al . ). Given that these events are organized in a highly orderly manner, MS could interrupt normal neural network formation even if it is transient during early brain development.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…These results indicate that neural activity is not required for FGF22 to induce IGF2 expression, but is necessary for IGF2 to localize to and organize development of presynaptic terminals. To confirm that the activity of presynaptic neurons is critical for the localization and function of IGF2, we suppressed intrinsic neuronal excitability of DGCs by sparsely transfecting the inwardly rectifying potassium channel, Kir2.1, in culture ( Johnson-Venkatesh et al, 2015 ). Similarly to the results with TTX, Kir2.1 expression in DGCs decreased the synaptic localization of IGF2 ( Figure 6G and H ) and completely blocked the synaptogenic function of IGF2 ( Figure 6I and J ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various forms of activity are involved: in most cases, synaptic transmission and synaptic competition are considered critical for synapse refinement ( Lichtman and Colman, 2000 ; Waites et al, 2005 ). In addition, intrinsic activity also plays critical roles in synapse development ( Johnson-Venkatesh et al, 2015 ). However, the molecular mechanisms by which intrinsic activity contributes to synapse stabilization during development are largely unknown.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%