2000
DOI: 10.1088/0953-4075/33/22/318
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Excitation and ionization in H(1s)-H(1s) collisions: II. Inclusion of electron exchange

Abstract: Hydrogen atom -hydrogen atom scattering is a prototype for many of the fundamental principles of atomic collisions. In this work we present the formalism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[16−18] The results of hidden crossings method [1,19] have obtained an excellent agreement with experimental data of H + in H(1s)+H(1s) collisions in the energy range of 0.05-1 keV. One-electron description [2] and twoelectron self-consistent-field description [20] of closecoupling approach have been carried out for H(2s), H(2p) and H + cross sections in H(1s)+H(1s) collisions, having the best agreement with the experimental data till now, still with discrepancies for H(2p) cross section unresolved.…”
mentioning
confidence: 69%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[16−18] The results of hidden crossings method [1,19] have obtained an excellent agreement with experimental data of H + in H(1s)+H(1s) collisions in the energy range of 0.05-1 keV. One-electron description [2] and twoelectron self-consistent-field description [20] of closecoupling approach have been carried out for H(2s), H(2p) and H + cross sections in H(1s)+H(1s) collisions, having the best agreement with the experimental data till now, still with discrepancies for H(2p) cross section unresolved.…”
mentioning
confidence: 69%
“…In the peak position around 20 keV, our CTMC calculations underestimate the experimental data by 9.4-9.9%, and beyond 50 keV, our results overestimate the experimental data [6,8] by 14.3-30.7%. The results of time-dependent self-consistent-field description in the impact parameter approximation by Riley and Ritchie [20] underestimate the experimental data by 26.8-43.7% above 10keV. The experimental data of Wittkower et al [9] deviate apparently from those of Hill et al [6] and McClure [8] for incident energy below 50 keV.…”
mentioning
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Substituting the scattering wave function (16) into the Schrödinger equation 1and following the same procedure as in Section II A we obtain the final set of coupledchannel differential equations…”
Section: B Hydrogen-hydrogen Collisionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spin effects are expected to be small in the energy range between 10 keV and 3 MeV where we apply our method. However, at low energies, in particular around 10 keV and below, the spin effects become important [13][14][15][16]. Nevertheless, to our best knowledge, there has been no attempt to include them in stopping power calculations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%