1981
DOI: 10.1007/3540167099_7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Excitation Dynamics in Molecular Solids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1984
1984
1996
1996

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 128 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For a triplet state, the distance d at which the energy-transfer rate is equal to the unimolecular decay rate is typically (3-5) X where Rm is the next neighbor distance (5 Á for naphthalene) in neat crystals. 41 The intermolecular distance is large (14 Á) in stoichiometric naphthalene choleic acid; therefore the number of sites visited by a donor excitation is small. Theories of single-step transfer and multistep energy transfer were used to fit the experimental data, and singlestep transfer provides the best fit.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For a triplet state, the distance d at which the energy-transfer rate is equal to the unimolecular decay rate is typically (3-5) X where Rm is the next neighbor distance (5 Á for naphthalene) in neat crystals. 41 The intermolecular distance is large (14 Á) in stoichiometric naphthalene choleic acid; therefore the number of sites visited by a donor excitation is small. Theories of single-step transfer and multistep energy transfer were used to fit the experimental data, and singlestep transfer provides the best fit.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A for naphthalene) in neat crystals 41. The intermolecular distance is large (14 A) in stoichiometric naphthalene choleic acid; therefore the number of sites visited by a donor excitation is small.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since this mechanism depends crucially on the time, it has been called "dynamic percolation". 6 It should be mentioned that it is assumed throughout this work, as is commonly done in studies of isotopically mixed (proto in deutero) organic crystals, that the isotopic impurities enter the lattice randomly and substitutionally, since the host and trap are nearly chemically identical. Thus there are no inhomogeneous domains of protonated or deuterated species; whatever connections exist between traps are assumed to arise stochastically because of the random placement of traps near each other.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%