1970
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.1.444
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Excitation of Collective States in Light Nuclei by Inelastic Scattering of 20.3-MeV Polarized Protons

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

1973
1973
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These fits to the data are comparable to those obtained with a Yukawa interaction which fits low-energy nucleon-nucleon scattering [5] or with the Kallio-Koltveit interaction [4], although both give cross sections which are larger by about a factor of 2 than does the HL Fig. 5 shows the results using the renormalized densities at 17, 20, and 25 MeV, compared to the data [20][21][22]. The fits here are comparable, but appear to deteriorate as the energy is lowered.…”
Section: Comparison With Measured Cross Sectionssupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These fits to the data are comparable to those obtained with a Yukawa interaction which fits low-energy nucleon-nucleon scattering [5] or with the Kallio-Koltveit interaction [4], although both give cross sections which are larger by about a factor of 2 than does the HL Fig. 5 shows the results using the renormalized densities at 17, 20, and 25 MeV, compared to the data [20][21][22]. The fits here are comparable, but appear to deteriorate as the energy is lowered.…”
Section: Comparison With Measured Cross Sectionssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…We have not made an exhaustive study of spin-dependent effects, consequently we do not examine polarization data [21,22]. Further, we expect the relative importance of the S= 1 amplitudes to be reduced by the collective coherence effects for the two states we consider and this was borne out by the results described in Section 5 above.…”
Section: Spin Dependencementioning
confidence: 98%
“…successful for collective 2+ or 3 states for several nuclei in the £ 712 , the g 912 , and the s-d shells (Glashausser et al 1967(Glashausser et al , 1968Baugh et al 1967;Fricke et al 1967;Lewis et al• 1967. These distorted~wave Born approxication (DWBA) analyses with collectivemodel form factors provided reasonable agreement with the analysing powers only when the fo~ factor included terms resulting from deforming the complete optical poter..tial, i.e.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For simplicity, the spin-orbit fort:\ factor used was essentially phenomenological (Fricke et al 1967;Blair et al 1970). Later, Sherif and Blair introduced the "full Thomas" form of the spin-orbit potential in the mmA collective-model fornalism (Sherif and Blair 1968).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Good agreement between the CC calculations using optical model parameters from Table 1 and the cross section and analyzing power data [4,[10][11][12][13] has been obtained by varying the spin-orbit deformation strength. Figures 1, 2 and 3 show the best agreement between these analyzing power data and the calculations.…”
Section: Analysesmentioning
confidence: 91%