2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10959-016-0697-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Excited Random Walks with Non-nearest Neighbor Steps

Abstract: Abstract. Let W be an integer valued random variable satisfying E[W ] =: δ ≥ 0 and P (W < 0) > 0, and consider a self-interacting random walk that behaves like a simple symmetric random walk with the exception that on the first visit to any integer x ∈ Z the size of the next step is an independent random variable with the same distribution as W . We show that this self-interacting random walk is recurrent if δ ≤ 1 and transient if δ > 1. This is a special case of our main result which concerns the recurrence a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…, M τ 2k } the rotors to the left of X τ 2k point right and the rotors to the right of X τ 2k point left. These rotors coincide with the native environment (12) with the origin shifted to X τ 2k . Therefore, starting at time τ 2k until the time τ 2k+1 when it exits the interval I k , the p-rotor walk is a correlated random walk with persistence 1 − p (Definition 2.4).…”
Section: Proposition 26mentioning
confidence: 76%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…, M τ 2k } the rotors to the left of X τ 2k point right and the rotors to the right of X τ 2k point left. These rotors coincide with the native environment (12) with the origin shifted to X τ 2k . Therefore, starting at time τ 2k until the time τ 2k+1 when it exits the interval I k , the p-rotor walk is a correlated random walk with persistence 1 − p (Definition 2.4).…”
Section: Proposition 26mentioning
confidence: 76%
“…If the local chain (Xtkx+1)k1 is only assumed to be hidden Markov, then the answer is yes, as shown by Pinsky and Travers . For excited random walks with non‐nearest neighbor steps, the question of transience/recurrence was investigated in . It may be useful to understand if one can adapt their results in our setting of locally Markov walks.…”
Section: Higher Dimensions and Longer Jumpsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We call the process X described above (L, 1) non-nearest neighbors excited random walk ((L, 1)-ERW, for brevity). It is worth mentioning that (L, 1)-ERW is a special case of excited random walks with non-nearest neighbour steps considered by Davis and Peterson in [5] in which the particle can also jump to non-nearest neighbours on the right and Λ can be an unbounded subset of Z. In particular, Theorem 1.6 in [5] implies that the process studied in this paper is…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Additionally, Davis and Peterson conjectured that the limiting speed of the random walk exists if δ > 1 and it is positive when δ > 2. (see Conjecture 1.8 in [5]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%