Reaction of K 4 [Ru(CN) 6 ] with 2,2Ј:4Ј,4Љ-terpyridine (L 1 ) or 2,2Ј:3Ј,2Љ:6Љ,2ٞ-quaterpyridine (L 2 ) in acidic aqueous methanol affords the complexes K 2 [Ru(L 1 )(CN) 4 ] and K 2 [Ru(L 2 )(CN) 4 ] respectively, both containing the {Ru(bipy)(CN) 4 } 2Ϫ chromophore but with pendant pyridyl or bipyridyl units, respectively. Time-resolved IR analysis of K 2 [Ru(CN) 4 (L 2 )] in MeCN-D 2 O showed that the most intense CN stretching vibration shifted to higher energy by ca. 50 cm Ϫ1 after laser excitation, consistent with formation of a Ru()/(L 2 ) ؒϪ MLCT excited state for which the lifetime measurement (38 ± 5 ns, measured by TRIR) agrees reasonably well with the value measured by luminescence methods (30 ± 2 ns). Study of the pH dependence of the absorption and emission spectra of the two complexes revealed the presence of two different effects arising from protonation of the pendant pyridyl/bipyridyl site (which occurs with pK a ≈ 3.1 in each case) and protonation of the cyanide ligands (which occurs with pK a ≈ 2 in each case). For K 2 [Ru(L 1 )(CN) 4 ], protonation of the pendant pyridyl unit results in the 1 MLCT excited state being lowered in energy by ca. 1000 cm Ϫ1 , whereas at lower pH values (2.5-1), protonation of the cyanide ligands raises the 1 MLCT excited state energy by over 2000 cm Ϫ1 . For K 2 [Ru(L 2 )(CN) 4 ] in contrast, protonation of the pendant bipyridyl unit has no detectable effect on the 1 MLCT energy, as the pendant site is electronically decoupled from the complex core by a substantial twist between the free and coordinated bipy components of L 2 ; protonation of the cyanides at lower pH values however destabilises the 1 MLCT excited state. Protonation of the pendant pyridyl sites results in complete (for [Ru(L 1 )(CN) 4 ] 2Ϫ ) or near-complete (for [Ru(L 2 )(CN) 4 ] 2Ϫ ) quenching of the luminescence; possible reasons for this behaviour are discussed. The crystal structures of the two related complexes [Ru( t Bu 2 bipy) 2 (L 1 )][PF 6 ] 2 and [Cl 2 Pt(µ-L 2 )Ru(bipy) 2 ][PF 6 ] 2 are also described to illustrate arguments about the conformations of L 1 and L 2 .
DALTON