2016
DOI: 10.7567/jjap.55.060304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exciton–exciton scattering in perovskite CH3NH3PbBr3 single crystal

Abstract: We have measured photoluminescence spectra in CH3NH3PbBr3 at low temperatures and found a nonlinear emission at the lower energy side of the exciton resonance. Considering that this signal shows a rapid decay, we have assigned it as originating from the exciton–exciton inelastic scattering process called P-emission. The energy difference between this P-emission and the free exciton resonance is 20–30 meV, which is consistent with recent studies of the exciton binding energy.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
17
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
3
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As mentioned, the origins of the dual PL peaks in perovskite SCs (and also reported for PC TF) are still under intense debate. Explanations range from (1) lateral inhomogeneities and coexistence of structural phases 13,18 ; (2) defect bound carriers or bound exciton emission 12 ; (3) surface versus bulk emission 14,15 ; (4) free carrier versus exciton emission 17 ; (5) phonon replica 26 ; (6) inelastic exciton–exciton scattering (P emission) 27 , exciton–electron scattering (H emission) or biexciton emission; and (7) the reabsorption effect 16,2830 . However, none can satisfactorily account for the dual PL peaks and its universal nature.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mentioned, the origins of the dual PL peaks in perovskite SCs (and also reported for PC TF) are still under intense debate. Explanations range from (1) lateral inhomogeneities and coexistence of structural phases 13,18 ; (2) defect bound carriers or bound exciton emission 12 ; (3) surface versus bulk emission 14,15 ; (4) free carrier versus exciton emission 17 ; (5) phonon replica 26 ; (6) inelastic exciton–exciton scattering (P emission) 27 , exciton–electron scattering (H emission) or biexciton emission; and (7) the reabsorption effect 16,2830 . However, none can satisfactorily account for the dual PL peaks and its universal nature.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The energy separation between exciton absorption peak and stimulated emission peak, 54 meV, largely exceeds biexciton binding energy value (ranging from 1/10 to 1/5 of exciton binding energy [ 33 ] ). Biexciton mechanism can be ruled out.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17 Similar phenomenon in hybrid halide perovskites such as CH 3 NH 3 PbX 3 (X ¼ Br, I) was advised to be from free carriers and exciton recombination, 18 the transverse inhomogeneity and structure coexistence, [19][20][21] and the inelastic exciton-exciton scattering or biexciton emission. 22 Emission spectra with three peaks were assigned to two BEs and an FE emission. 23,24 Even without observation of two or more luminescence peaks, the low-temperature PL spectrum of CsPbX 3 usually reveals an asymmetric tail in the low-energy side of the FE peak, implying the existence of some weak components.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%