Excitonic exchange effects on the radiative decay time of monoexcitons and biexcitons in quantum dots

Abstract

Electron-hole exchange interactions split the exciton ground state into "dark" and "bright" states. The dynamics of those states depends on the internal relaxation time between bright and dark states (spin-flip time), and on the radiative recombination time of the bright states. On the other hand, the calculated values of these recombination times depend not only on the treatment of correlation effects, but also on the accuracy of the electron and hole wavefunctions. We calculate the radiative decay rates for monoexcitons and biexcitons in (In,As)Ga/GaAs self-assembled and colloidal CdSe quantum dots from atomistic correlated wave functions. We show how the radiative decay time τR(X 0 ) of the monoexciton depends on the spin-flip relaxation time between bright and dark states. In contrast, a biexciton has no bright-dark splitting, so the decay time of the biexciton τR(XX 0 ) is insensitive to this spin-flip time. This results in ratios τR(X 0 )/τR(XX 0 ) of 4 in the case of fast spin flip, and a ratio of 2 in the case of slow spin flip. For (In,Ga)As/GaAs, we compare our results with the model calculation of Wimmer et al. [M. Wimmer et al., Phys. Rev. B 73, 165305 (2006)]. When the same spin-flip rates are assumed, our predicted τR(X 0 )/τR(XX 0 ) agrees with that of Wimmer et al., suggesting that our treatment of correlations is adequate to predict the ratio of monoexciton and biexciton radiative lifetimes. Our results agree well with experiment on self-assembled quantum dots when assuming slow spin flip. Conversely, for colloidal dots the agreement with experiment is best for fast spin flip.PACS numbers:

Photoneutralization and slow capture of carriers in quantum dots probed by resonant excitation spectroscopy

“…These calculations are in perfect agreement with timeresolved experiments performed in QDs ensemble [5] and in single QDs [6] where capture times of the order of 100 ps have been measured. On the other hand, irreversible Auger scattering is mainly responsible for the intra-dot relaxation process, and theoretical calculations [1,7] give estimate of the corresponding relaxation times in the 100 fs -10 ps range. In fact, differential transmission measurements [8], pump-probe spectroscopy [9] and time-resolved experiments [10,11] showed that the Auger-assisted processes involved in the intra-dot carriers relaxation occur within characteristic times between 1 ps and 10 ps.…”

Excited-state relaxation in PbSe quantum dots

“…Even in much larger, selfassembled InGaAs/GaAs dots, the spacing between the electronic levels (∼50 meV) is larger than the LO phonon energy (∼30 meV). [13][14][15][16] When the spacing between electronic levels exceeds the phonon energy, one would expect [5,6] under the adiabatic approximation [17] no phonon-assisted relaxation, on account of the unavailability of energy-conserving phonons. This scenario led to the expectation [4,5] of slow intra-band relaxation of high-energy states in quantum dots [ Fig.…”

Two-state switching and dynamics in quantum dot two-section lasers

“…6,7 This is close to values determined by other techniques [14][15][16] and predicted by theory. 17 The capture time c , whose value was checked not to play an important role, was fixed to 10 ps. This is also in the range of capture times reported by other authors.…”