1995
DOI: 10.1016/0361-9230(95)02030-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Excitotoxic lesions of the core and shell subregions of the nucleus accumbens differentially disrupt body weight regulation and motor activity in rat

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
40
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
5
40
1
Order By: Relevance
“…AcbC lesions also reduced efficiency (the number of responses made per reward earned) in a differential-reinforcement-oflow-rates (DRL) schedule (Pothuizen et al, 2005), in which animals must respond below a certain rate in order to obtain reward. This is much like the effects of whole-Acb lesions (Reading & Dunnett, 1995), although the DRL task may also be susceptible to general levels of motor activity: AcbC-lesioned rats are hyperactive Cardinal et al, 2001;Maldonado-Irizarry & Kelley, 1995;Parkinson, Olmstead, Burns, Robbins, & Everitt, 1999), and hyperactivity would itself tend to reduce DRL efficiency.…”
Section: Choice Involving Delayed Reinforcementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…AcbC lesions also reduced efficiency (the number of responses made per reward earned) in a differential-reinforcement-oflow-rates (DRL) schedule (Pothuizen et al, 2005), in which animals must respond below a certain rate in order to obtain reward. This is much like the effects of whole-Acb lesions (Reading & Dunnett, 1995), although the DRL task may also be susceptible to general levels of motor activity: AcbC-lesioned rats are hyperactive Cardinal et al, 2001;Maldonado-Irizarry & Kelley, 1995;Parkinson, Olmstead, Burns, Robbins, & Everitt, 1999), and hyperactivity would itself tend to reduce DRL efficiency.…”
Section: Choice Involving Delayed Reinforcementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, delay discounting and probability discounting may also reflect separate processes contributing to the selection of outcomes, as discussed above. Damage to the AcbC can produce impulsive choice, an impaired ability to choose delayed rewards Pothuizen et al, 2005), in addition to hyperactivity Cardinal et al, 2001;Maldonado-Irizarry & Kelley, 1995;Parkinson, Olmstead, et al, 1999), though without impairments in attentional function (Christakou, Robbins, & Everitt, 2004;Cole & Robbins, 1989) and without motoric impulsivity as assessed by the stop-signal task (Eagle & Robbins, 2003). Destruction of the AcbC does not, therefore, mimic all the signs of ADHD, but these findings suggest that the behaviour of rats with AcbC damage resembles that of humans with the hyperactive-impulsive subtype of ADHD (APA, 2000).…”
Section: Integration Of Acbc Functions With Respect To Impulsivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…25 In monkeys, the NA shell is more sensitive to novel circumstances and more involved in visceral and motivational mechanisms 26,27 than the NA core, which is involved specifically in motor control and the learning of appetitive behavioral responses. 28,29 Considering these functional roles in the caudate and NA, neuronal activation of these nuclei likely affects motor performance.…”
Section: Role Of the Mesolimbocortical Dopaminergic Pathwaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…N-methyl-d-aspartate lesions of the NAc core induced weight loss in rats, whereas the shell-lesion group gained weight. 66 The authors of the study argued that the loss of weight in the core group was due to changes in motor function given the core's connections to the extrapyramidal system. 29 It is conceivable that the core and shell have opposing effects on ingestive behavior, explaining the lack of any change in weight with large, nonspecific excitotoxic lesions encompassing both regions of the NAc.…”
Section: Evidence From Lesion Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%