2004
DOI: 10.1037/0735-7044.118.2.365
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Excitotoxic Lesions of the Gustatory Thalamus Spare Simultaneous Contrast Effects but Eliminate Anticipatory Negative Contrast: Evidence Against a Memory Deficit.

Abstract: Using consummately contrast procedures and the same taste stimuli (0.15% saccharin and 1.0 M sucrose), the authors tested the hypothesis that lesions of the gustatory thalamus disrupt gustatory memory in 2 experiments. In Experiment 1, irrespective of the duration of the intersolution interval (0 s, 30 s, 1 min, 2 min, 4 min, 8 min), thalamic lesions had no influence on the expression of simultaneous contrast effects. In Experiment 2, thalamic lesions abolished anticipatory negative contrast at the 0-s interso… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This effect, called the anticipatory contrast effect, is observed when saccharin is paired with drugs of abuse or when a weaker saccharin solution is paired with a subsequent stronger solution (Grigson and Freet 2000;Schroy et al 2005). Additional support comes from the observation that ibotenic acid lesions of the gustatory thalamus disrupt the avoidance of the saccharin produced by injection of drugs of abuse, but not by injection of lithium chloride (Grigson and Freet 2000;Schroy et al 2005;Reilly et al 2004). Rabin et al (1998) have reported similar results following exposure to heavy particles.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…This effect, called the anticipatory contrast effect, is observed when saccharin is paired with drugs of abuse or when a weaker saccharin solution is paired with a subsequent stronger solution (Grigson and Freet 2000;Schroy et al 2005). Additional support comes from the observation that ibotenic acid lesions of the gustatory thalamus disrupt the avoidance of the saccharin produced by injection of drugs of abuse, but not by injection of lithium chloride (Grigson and Freet 2000;Schroy et al 2005;Reilly et al 2004). Rabin et al (1998) have reported similar results following exposure to heavy particles.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…The suppressive effects of cocaine and sucrose, but not LiCl, are augmented in rats with a history of chronic morphine treatment [57]. Finally, bilateral lesions of the gustatory thalamus or gustatory cortex disrupt the suppressive effects of morphine, cocaine, and sucrose, but have no impact on the development of a LiCl-induced CTA [58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65]. Taken together, the data confirm that drug-induced suppression of CS intake is not mediated by a conditioned taste aversion like that induced by the aversive agent.…”
Section: The Model: Experimenter Delivered Drugmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thorough reviews of earlier studies suggested that the claim of the involvement of VPMpc in taste preference, sodium appetite, and CTA were derived from the lesions that were misplaced, inordinately large, or destroyed fibers of passage (58,60,69). More recent investigations indicated that the VPMpc is instead involved in more complex gustatory information processing tasks, e.g., anticipatory contrast effect in which rats reduce intake of an otherwise palatable (saccharin) solution when presentation of this solution predicts access to a more preferred (sucrose) solution over repeated daily pairings (18,61,67).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%