2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jde.2018.06.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Excluding blowup at zero points of the potential by means of Liouville-type theorems

Abstract: We prove a local version of a (global) result of Merle and Zaag about ODE behavior of solutions near blowup points for subcritical nonlinear heat equations. As an application, for the equation ut = ∆u + V (x)f (u), we rule out the possibility of blowup at zero points of the potential V for monotone in time solutions when f (u) ∼ u p for large u, both in the Sobolev subcritical case and in the radial case. This solves a problem left open in previous work on the subject. Suitable Liouville-type theorems play a c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Namely, the Liouville-type theorem in [31] states that any ancient solution of (1.22) with self-similar temporal decay at −∞ must depend on the time-variable only. This is then used to show that blow-up solutions of (1.22) satisfy |u t − |u| p−1 u| ≤ ε|u| p + C ε (see also [33], [19], [22] for related results based on the Liouville theorem in [31]). The proof of Theorem 1.3 relies on Theorem 1.1, combined with suitable rescaling and compactness arguments.…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Namely, the Liouville-type theorem in [31] states that any ancient solution of (1.22) with self-similar temporal decay at −∞ must depend on the time-variable only. This is then used to show that blow-up solutions of (1.22) satisfy |u t − |u| p−1 u| ≤ ε|u| p + C ε (see also [33], [19], [22] for related results based on the Liouville theorem in [31]). The proof of Theorem 1.3 relies on Theorem 1.1, combined with suitable rescaling and compactness arguments.…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We are now in a position to give the proof of Theorem 1.3, by combining Propositions 3.1-5.2 and an appropriate rescaling argument. As mentioned in Remark 1.2, we shall adapt the strategy in [31] to our problem, also using some simplifications from [22].…”
Section: Proof Of Theorem 13mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Returning to the original variables, we get the estimate (24) on u t . Estimate ( 23) is easily obtained by (24), equation (2), and (18). The proof is now complete.…”
Section: Proof Of Corollary 1 Let Us Writementioning
confidence: 74%
“…Consider first the case of q > q c . The local L q norm in |x| ≤ K −θ T (T −t) 1/2+θω may be readily estimated by (18) and the change of variable…”
Section: Proof Of Corollary 1 Let Us Writementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation