2006
DOI: 10.1007/s10354-005-0238-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exclusion of trisialo-transferrin from carbohydrate-deficient transferrin measurement: advantage in patients with chronic liver disease?

Abstract: The newly developed carbohydrate deficient transferrin test (CDT-TRISIALO (-)) is of no advantage as compared to the established assay (CDT-TRISIALO (+)) when used in a patient population with liver disease. In that population, normal CDT-TRISIALO (-) helps to exclude recent alcohol consumption; this results from the high negative predictive value of a normal CDT-TRISIALO (-).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 30 publications
(28 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The performance of biomarkers in screening for alcoholism is controversial and most studies refer exclusively to the diagnosis of alcoholism itself and not the differentiation of ASH from NASH [17][18][19][20]. Furthermore, standard laboratory tests [mean corpuscular volume (MCV), carbohydrate deficient transferrin (CDT), gamma glutamyl transferase (GGT), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST)] may be helpful in monitoring alcohol dependence but they have low sensitivity for diagnosing the degree of alcohol consumption [21,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The performance of biomarkers in screening for alcoholism is controversial and most studies refer exclusively to the diagnosis of alcoholism itself and not the differentiation of ASH from NASH [17][18][19][20]. Furthermore, standard laboratory tests [mean corpuscular volume (MCV), carbohydrate deficient transferrin (CDT), gamma glutamyl transferase (GGT), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST)] may be helpful in monitoring alcohol dependence but they have low sensitivity for diagnosing the degree of alcohol consumption [21,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%