1994
DOI: 10.1080/0013188940360101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exclusions from school: current trends and issues

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
37
0
5

Year Published

2001
2001
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
37
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Male students consistently and disproportionately receive disciplinary actions in schools (Mendez & Knoff, 2003;Skiba, Peterson, & Williams, 1997). In fact, the rate of disciplinary actions for male students has been found to range between two (Mendez & Knoff, 2003) to four (Imich, 1994) times the rate of female students. African American males are at particular risk for receiving harsh disciplinary consequences (Losen & Skiba, 2010), with one study documenting this population to be 16 times more likely to receive corporal punishment than White females (Gregory, 1996).…”
Section: Student Characteristics and Disciplinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Male students consistently and disproportionately receive disciplinary actions in schools (Mendez & Knoff, 2003;Skiba, Peterson, & Williams, 1997). In fact, the rate of disciplinary actions for male students has been found to range between two (Mendez & Knoff, 2003) to four (Imich, 1994) times the rate of female students. African American males are at particular risk for receiving harsh disciplinary consequences (Losen & Skiba, 2010), with one study documenting this population to be 16 times more likely to receive corporal punishment than White females (Gregory, 1996).…”
Section: Student Characteristics and Disciplinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…They argue that the justification for exclusion is to force a student to behave and thereby remain in the school. However, evidence from Christle, Nelson, and Jolivette (2004), Imich (1994), Skiba, Peterson, and Williams (1997), and Kupchik and Catlaw (2015) suggests that exclusion is, in itself, driving students farther from the supports of the school, thus eroding their stake in the institution and broader society. These findings appear to directly challenge whether administrators, in following school and district policies, are responding to students' needs.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although existing literature condemns exclusionary practices (Imich, 1994;Maag, 2001;Morrison & Skiba, 2001), schools choose this route more than any other form of discipline (Raffaele-Mendez et al, 2002;Skiba, Peterson, & Williams, 1997). Although in-school suspension is an alternative that is used in schools to avoid removing students from school supports, the practice was not articulated as a disciplinary school-response option in the drug and alcohol policies reviewed in this study.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many studies attribute this increase to high-stakes accountability policies such as 'No child left behind' and 'zero tolerance' (Imich, 1994;Leone et al, 2000;Skiba et al, 1997). There are reports that students have been suspended for relatively minor disruptive behaviors, such as having a knife ('potential weapon') in the lunch box or talking on a cell phone while at school (American Psychological Association Zero Tolerance Task Force, 2008).…”
Section: Background and Existing Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%