2011
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.84.094031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exclusive decay ofP-wave bottomonium into doubleJ/ψ

Abstract: We calculate the relativistic corrections of J/ψ, including electromagnetic corrections, to χ bJ → J/ψJ/ψ in the framework of nonrelativistic QCD factorization. The relativistic effect is found to increase the lower-order prediction for the decay width by about 10%, while the electromagnetism contribution is very small, about 0.2% for χ b0 and χ b2 . The total branching ratio is predicted to be of order 10 −5 for χ b0,b2 → J/ψJ/ψ, but 10 −11 for χ b1 → J/ψJ/ψ, since there is only electromagnetism contribution … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

4
12
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
4
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The results obtained on the χ bJ decay branching fractions are listed in Table I. Our upper limits are much lower than the central values predicted in the LC formalism [15] and pQCD calculation [16], but are consistent with calculations using the NRQCD factorization approach [13,14]. Here n up is the upper limit on the number of signal events, ε is the sum of the efficiencies from different modes with J/ψ and ψ ′ decay branching fractions and trigger efficiency included, σsys is the total systematic error, and BR is the upper limit on the branching fraction of χ bJ decays, where the values of B(Υ(2S) → γχ bJ ) = (3.8 ± 0.4)%, (6.9 ± 0.4)% and (7.15 ± 0.35)% for J = 0, 1 and 2 are used [24].…”
Section: −11supporting
confidence: 84%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The results obtained on the χ bJ decay branching fractions are listed in Table I. Our upper limits are much lower than the central values predicted in the LC formalism [15] and pQCD calculation [16], but are consistent with calculations using the NRQCD factorization approach [13,14]. Here n up is the upper limit on the number of signal events, ε is the sum of the efficiencies from different modes with J/ψ and ψ ′ decay branching fractions and trigger efficiency included, σsys is the total systematic error, and BR is the upper limit on the branching fraction of χ bJ decays, where the values of B(Υ(2S) → γχ bJ ) = (3.8 ± 0.4)%, (6.9 ± 0.4)% and (7.15 ± 0.35)% for J = 0, 1 and 2 are used [24].…”
Section: −11supporting
confidence: 84%
“…[14] considered corrections to all orders in v c in the charmonium rest frame, and found decay partial widths that are about a factor of three larger than those in Ref. [13]. In the light cone (LC) formalism, however, much larger production rates (with uncertainties of 50% to 70%) are obtained in Ref.…”
Section: −11mentioning
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Several theoretical calculations have focused on these processes in perturbative QCD, e.g., η b → J/ψJ/ψ [22][23][24][25] and χ b0,1,2 → J/ψJ/ψ [26][27][28][29]. Experimentally, however, such studies are extremely sparse, apart from the recent searches for several channels of χ bJ into double charmonia for the first time by the Belle Collaboration [30].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%