2020
DOI: 10.35188/unu-wider/2020/810-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exclusive growth? Rapidly increasing top incomes amid low national growth in South Africa

Abstract: analysis and policy advice with the aim of promoting sustainable and equitable development. The Institute began operations in 1985 in Helsinki, Finland, as the first research and training centre of the United Nations University. Today it is a unique blend of think tank, research institute, and UN agency-providing a range of services from policy advice to governments as well as freely available original research.The Institute is funded through income from an endowment fund with additional contributions to its w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 3 shows taxable incomes at the 90th, 50th, and 10th percentiles. Further research, following on from Wittenberg (2017) and Bassier and Woolard (2018), could be undertaken to assess how the income distribution from the panel, especially at the top end, compares to surveys in South Africa such as the Income and Expenditure Survey, the QLFS, and the National Income Dynamics Survey. Previous research to compare these data sources has either used the aggregated Tax Statistics published by SARS and National Treasury, or a sample of micro data from one or two years, both of which have relied on the ITR12 returns alone.…”
Section: Implications For Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 3 shows taxable incomes at the 90th, 50th, and 10th percentiles. Further research, following on from Wittenberg (2017) and Bassier and Woolard (2018), could be undertaken to assess how the income distribution from the panel, especially at the top end, compares to surveys in South Africa such as the Income and Expenditure Survey, the QLFS, and the National Income Dynamics Survey. Previous research to compare these data sources has either used the aggregated Tax Statistics published by SARS and National Treasury, or a sample of micro data from one or two years, both of which have relied on the ITR12 returns alone.…”
Section: Implications For Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper is complemented by recent work by Bassier and Woolard (2018), who drill down into the SARS data and household survey data to make two critical points. The first is that in the years between 2003 and 2015, nearly 60 per cent of the population earned zero taxable income.…”
Section: A New Focus On the Top End Of The Income Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of this database has also helped identify more top earners than previously thought. For instance, Credit Suisse in 2016 estimated that there were about 45,000 dollar millionaires in the country, but Bassier and Woolard (2018) put the number at about 182,000. Hundenborn et al (2018b) calculate that the number of people who earned over R10 million per year had more than doubled from 482 in 2011 to 1,048 in 2014.…”
Section: A New Focus On the Top End Of The Income Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of recent studies have explored in detail the quality of income data using South African survey or Census data. These include detailed fiscal analysis using the Income and Expenditure Survey (IES) 2010/11 (Inchauste et al, 2015); spatial analysis of small area level income data using the 2011 Census of Population (Noble et al, 2013); analysis of data on wealth using the National Income Dynamics Study (NIDS) (Orthofer, 2016); in-depth analysis of the income distribution also using NIDS (Hundenborn et al, 2017) and the Post-Apartheid Labour Market Series (PALMS) dataset (Bassier and Woolard, 2018;Wittenberg, 2017). The latter four studies drew from administrative data on income tax to validate the income data in NIDS (Hundenborn et al, 2017;Orthofer, 2016) and PALMS (Bassier and Woolard, 2018;Wittenberg, 2017) respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include detailed fiscal analysis using the Income and Expenditure Survey (IES) 2010/11 (Inchauste et al, 2015); spatial analysis of small area level income data using the 2011 Census of Population (Noble et al, 2013); analysis of data on wealth using the National Income Dynamics Study (NIDS) (Orthofer, 2016); in-depth analysis of the income distribution also using NIDS (Hundenborn et al, 2017) and the Post-Apartheid Labour Market Series (PALMS) dataset (Bassier and Woolard, 2018;Wittenberg, 2017). The latter four studies drew from administrative data on income tax to validate the income data in NIDS (Hundenborn et al, 2017;Orthofer, 2016) and PALMS (Bassier and Woolard, 2018;Wittenberg, 2017) respectively. There is a growing recognition of the importance of administrative data as a data resource on income, especially with reference to individuals working in the formal sector, and recently the National Treasury (NT) and the South African Revenue Service (SARS) have made anonymized personal income tax data available for research purposes (Arndt, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%