2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.cegh.2022.101116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exclusive use of hygienic menstrual absorbents among rural adolescent women in India: A geospatial analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This category was coded as ‘0’. This variable has been defined in this way in many previous studies in India [ 16 , 18 , 26 , 30 , 32 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This category was coded as ‘0’. This variable has been defined in this way in many previous studies in India [ 16 , 18 , 26 , 30 , 32 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, no study in India has examined how the use of hygienic methods varies among adolescent women in rural India using a nationally representative sample. The review of previous literature also reveals that sub-national geographical disparities in the use of hygienic methods among adolescent women in rural India have remained unexplored [ 30 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of studies in the recent past have attempted to understand the knowledge, attitude and practices regarding hygienic materials of protection during menstruation among adolescent girls in urban India [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24]. It is reported that there are considerable differences in urban women's choice of menstrual absorbents based on socioeconomic and biodemographic variables in India [21,[25][26][27][28][29][30]. However, most of these studies are limited in their geographical scope.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There were seven options for response: cloth, sanitary napkins, locally made napkins, tampons, menstrual cups, nothing, and others. On the basis of these responses, we created a binary outcome variable titled ‘exclusive use of hygienic materials’, in which women using materials such as sanitary napkins, locally made napkins, tampons, and menstrual cups were coded as “1”; and those using non-hygienic and reusable materials such as cloths, both hygienic and non-hygienic materials, or not using any form of menstrual materials were coded as “0” ( Anand, Singh & Unisa, 2015 ; Ram et al, 2020 ; Vishwakarma, Puri & Sharma, 2020 ; Roy et al, 2021 ; Singh et al, 2022a ; Singh et al, 2022c ; Singh et al, 2022b ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%