2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.micpro.2006.10.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Executing large algorithms on low-capacity FPGAs using flowpath partitioning and runtime reconfiguration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The number of I/O must also be considered. In fact, a similar architecture exists that uses only 2 FPGAs [5]. This is an advantage of flowpaths over using other methods, such as Handel-C, for generating hardware from software.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The number of I/O must also be considered. In fact, a similar architecture exists that uses only 2 FPGAs [5]. This is an advantage of flowpaths over using other methods, such as Handel-C, for generating hardware from software.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Flowpaths can outperform microprocessors at lower clock frequencies and therefore consume less power than microprocessors or microprocessor cores. Flowpaths can be partitioned into subsets that can take advantage of runtime dynamic partial reconfiguration [5].…”
Section: Flowpathsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…G. Seth Copen et al designed PipeRench [5] to overcome the disadvantages of using FPGA as reconfigurable computing fabrics through the hardware virtualization. M. H. Darrin and D. Michael proposed Flowpaths [6] through using lowcapacity FPGA to execute large circuit. This approach allowed one FPGA executing while another low-capacity FPGA was being dynamically reconfigured.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%