Research indicates that the neurocognitive system representing
nonsymbolic numerical magnitudes is foundational for the development of
mathematical competence. However, recent studies found that the most common task
used to measure numerical acuity, the nonsymbolic number comparison task, is
heavily influenced by non-numerical visual parameters of stimuli that increase
executive function demands. Further, this influence may be a confound
invalidating theoretical accounts of the relation between number comparison
performance and mathematical competence. Instead of acuity, the relation may
depend on attention to number, or one’s ability to attend to numerical
information in the face of competing, non-numerical cues. The current study
investigated this issue by measuring neural activity associated with numerical
magnitude processing acuity, domain-general attention, and selective attention
to number via functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) while children
8–11 years old completed a nonsymbolic number comparison task and a
flanker task. Results showed that activation in the right inferior frontal gyrus
during incongruent versus congruent trials of the comparison task, our construct
for attention to number, predicted mathematics achievement after controlling for
verbal IQ, flanker accuracy rate, and the neural congruency effect from the
flanker task. In contrast, activity in frontal and parietal regions responding
to differences in difficulty of numerical comparisons, our construct for
magnitude processing, did not correlate with achievement. Together, these
findings suggest a need to reframe existing models of the relation between
number processing and math competence to include the interaction between
attention and use of numerical information, or in other words “attention
to number”.