2010
DOI: 10.1007/s12160-010-9162-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Executive Function and Survival in the Context of Chronic Illness

Abstract: Individual differences in EF may be important determinants of survival in the context of chronic illness.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Hall et al (2006) found that better Stroop performance was related cross-sectionally to lower smoking rates, less alcohol consumption, and to better sleep quality in a community sample spanning 20–100 years of age. In another study, Hall et al (2010) found that higher EF performance predicted a greater likelihood of survival over a 10-year period among community-dwelling older adults suffering from one or more chronic illnesses. Finally, it has been shown that overweight and obese children with a greater valuation of delayed monetary and food rewards, relative to immediate rewards, show improved weight loss (Best et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…For example, Hall et al (2006) found that better Stroop performance was related cross-sectionally to lower smoking rates, less alcohol consumption, and to better sleep quality in a community sample spanning 20–100 years of age. In another study, Hall et al (2010) found that higher EF performance predicted a greater likelihood of survival over a 10-year period among community-dwelling older adults suffering from one or more chronic illnesses. Finally, it has been shown that overweight and obese children with a greater valuation of delayed monetary and food rewards, relative to immediate rewards, show improved weight loss (Best et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…TST suggests that self-regulation is based on an interaction of self-regulatory capacity, motivation, and ecological factors at the moment of choice, for example choosing short-term positive outcomes (e.g., relaxing rather than exercising) at the cost of long-term investments (e.g., long-term positive impact of physical activity). There are also indications that executive functions play a role in ability to self-regulate [12, 48], and neuro-cognitive comprise has been associated with lower medical adherence among HIV+ adults [49] as well as survival time in the context of chronic illness [48]. The results from the current study add to a new line of research, examining the impact of self-regulatory fatigue on outcomes among cancer patients and particularly patients preparing for HSCT, identifying significant and potentially detrimental links.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the DSST was categorized a measure of attention; however, it could also be conceptualized as a measure of task shifting, inhibition, and working memory (84,85). Heterogeneity in measurement of EF across studies, another limiting factor, may have resulted, at least in part, due to differences in study quality (see Supplemental Digital Content 2 for analysis and discussion of two indicators-sample size and confirmation of control status, http://links.lww.com/PSYMED/A159).…”
Section: Strengths and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%