2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5826.2009.00294.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Executive Function Coaching for College Students with Learning Disabilities and ADHD: A New Approach for Fostering Self–Determination

Abstract: Given growing numbers of college students with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and/or learning disabilities (LD), it is important to understand why these students choose ADD ("executive function") coaching to enhance their academic success when more traditional forms of campus support already offer this help. Fifty-four undergraduates with ADHD and/or LD participated in a study of their experiences with coaching. To better understand students' perspectives on the manner in which coaching helped… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
110
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(111 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
110
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite limitations of the study (e.g., findings cannot be generalized from the interviews and students' reflections were self-reported), Parker and Boutelle (2009), made the expert claim that coaching has the potential to benefit students, as indicated above. Parker and Boutelle (2009) also recommend that future studies be conducted with control groups to determine if ADD coaching lead to higher GPAs for participants, when compared to non-participants; determine if students who are coached, increase self-talk needed to independently coach themselves; and determine using longitudinal studies, if students who became self-regulated and self-determined through coaching, persisted with these attributes once they were no longer receiving coaching services.…”
Section: Student Success Coachingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Despite limitations of the study (e.g., findings cannot be generalized from the interviews and students' reflections were self-reported), Parker and Boutelle (2009), made the expert claim that coaching has the potential to benefit students, as indicated above. Parker and Boutelle (2009) also recommend that future studies be conducted with control groups to determine if ADD coaching lead to higher GPAs for participants, when compared to non-participants; determine if students who are coached, increase self-talk needed to independently coach themselves; and determine using longitudinal studies, if students who became self-regulated and self-determined through coaching, persisted with these attributes once they were no longer receiving coaching services.…”
Section: Student Success Coachingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Parker and Boutelle (2009) also recommend that future studies be conducted with control groups to determine if ADD coaching lead to higher GPAs for participants, when compared to non-participants; determine if students who are coached, increase self-talk needed to independently coach themselves; and determine using longitudinal studies, if students who became self-regulated and self-determined through coaching, persisted with these attributes once they were no longer receiving coaching services.…”
Section: Student Success Coachingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The treatment group acquired higher levels of self-advocacy skills than the comparison group, but they also developed higher levels of social competence. Support service offices should strive to promote the autonomy and self-advocacy of students with disabilities (Parker & Boutelle, 2009). These positive skills can be encouraged through direct intervention instruction, as in the intervention developed by Palmer and Roessler or other general studies courses and mentoring with other students with disabilities.…”
Section: Self-advocacy: Necessary Skills and Adolescent Development Cmentioning
confidence: 99%