1991
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1991.tb00351.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Executive Function Deficits in High‐Functioning Autistic Individuals: Relationship to Theory of Mind

Abstract: A group of high-functioning autistic individuals was compared to a clinical control group matched on VIQ, age, sex and SES. Significant group differences were found on executive function, theory of mind, emotion perception and verbal memory tests, but not on spatial or other control measures. Second-order theory of mind and executive function deficits were widespread among the autistic group, while first-order theory of mind deficits were found in only a subset of the sample. The relationship of executive func… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

58
944
15
77

Year Published

1998
1998
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,407 publications
(1,094 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
58
944
15
77
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, significant correlations between success at ToM tests and EF tasks in young children with autism were found to be independent of age and verbal as well as non-verbal ability (Pellicano, 2007), with dissociations being found in one direction only, namely impaired ToM with intact EF, suggesting that EF may indeed be an important factor in ToM development in autism. Moreover neurological considerations have been evoked to substantiate the idea of a potential link between ToM and EF and to explain why children with ASD may suffer from deficits in both of these cognitive realms (Ozonoff, Pennington, & Rogers, 1991), namely that the same regions of the brain that have been claimed to be implicated in EF have also been implicated in ToM, i.e. the prefrontal cortex and the right hemisphere (McDonald, 1993;Alexander, Benson, & Stuss, 1989;Brownell, 2000).…”
Section: Executive Functioning In Tom Tasksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, significant correlations between success at ToM tests and EF tasks in young children with autism were found to be independent of age and verbal as well as non-verbal ability (Pellicano, 2007), with dissociations being found in one direction only, namely impaired ToM with intact EF, suggesting that EF may indeed be an important factor in ToM development in autism. Moreover neurological considerations have been evoked to substantiate the idea of a potential link between ToM and EF and to explain why children with ASD may suffer from deficits in both of these cognitive realms (Ozonoff, Pennington, & Rogers, 1991), namely that the same regions of the brain that have been claimed to be implicated in EF have also been implicated in ToM, i.e. the prefrontal cortex and the right hemisphere (McDonald, 1993;Alexander, Benson, & Stuss, 1989;Brownell, 2000).…”
Section: Executive Functioning In Tom Tasksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CAM tests recognising emotions independent of weak central coherence (Frith, 1989) or executive function (Ozonoff, Pennington, & Rogers, 1991) because there is minimal context or planning, which burden working memory. However, like almost everything, responses do of course require some minimal inhibition (the ability to go through all the answers and choose the best one) and working memory.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Planning is a complex, dynamic operation in which a sequence of planned actions must be constantly monitored, re-evaluated and updated.Children, adolescents and adults with autism have been reported to be impaired on planning tests,suchastheTower ofLondon(seeBox2).This is the case in relation to age-matched clinical control groups including dyslexia, ADHD and Tourette syndrome [19][20][21][22][23][24] as well as to age-matched normally developing individuals [21] (see Figure 1). Furthermore this impairment is maintained over time [23].…”
Section: Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%