2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.braindev.2011.08.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Executive function in children with pervasive developmental disorder and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder assessed by the Keio version of the Wisconsin card sorting test

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
31
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Reaction times for all responses did not differ significantly between groups. These results indicate a deficit in cognitive shifting among children diagnosed with ADHD, consistent with previous studies [6]. The DCCS task requires participants to alter responses according to rule changes (color matching or shape matching).…”
Section: Group Differences In Cognitive Shiftingsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Reaction times for all responses did not differ significantly between groups. These results indicate a deficit in cognitive shifting among children diagnosed with ADHD, consistent with previous studies [6]. The DCCS task requires participants to alter responses according to rule changes (color matching or shape matching).…”
Section: Group Differences In Cognitive Shiftingsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Executive function is an assemblage of high-level cognitive domains, including inhibition, working memory, planning, fluency, and shifting, that facilitate the inhibition of incorrect behaviors and the selection of appropriate behaviors according to context and goals [4]. Cognitive shifting is the mental ability to switch between thinking about one concept and begin thinking of another; it is often measured using the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test [5][6][7][8]. Kado et al [6] previously demonstrated that children with ADHD make many more Nelsontype preservative errors (PENs) than do typically developing children (TDC).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was developed by Grant and Berg in 1948 [8] and was originally introduced as a measure of frontal lobe function by Milner [9]. It has been validated in children in several age groups [10], [11] and has been used clinically in children with ADHD [10], [12], Pervasive Developmental Disorder [12], temporal lobe epilepsy [13] and traumatic brain injury [14]. In the context of the WCST, learning consists of how fast a participant finds the card sorting rule and whether he is able to maintain it (see Methods below) [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Toward meeting these goals, we modified the WCST into the military relevant map task. Although adequate performance was met regarding percentage of correct responses and number of rules obtained, we were surprised by the high frequency of non-preservative errors compared to studies using the original WCST (Nelson, 1976;Ozonoff, 1995;Barceló and Knight, 2002;Kado et al, 2012). The high frequency of non-perseverative errors cannot be explained by poor working memory or processing speed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%