2012
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2022334
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Executive Stock Options: Portfolio Effects

Abstract: Since executives typically receive new grants of stock options (ESOs) each year, longerserving executives often have portfolios of ESOs with differing strikes and maturities. Valuation models for stand-alone ESO grants have shown that trading restrictions, which force executives to bear unhedgeable risk until the options are exercised, induce earlier exercise and hence a lower cost to shareholders than in a risk-neutral setting. However, since unhedgeable risk varies non-linearly with portfolio size and compos… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There has been an debate as to whether Black–Scholes is the appropriate way to measure the value of an option granted to an executive (Lambert et al ., ; Hall and Murphy, , ; Henderson et al ., ). The Black–Scholes method provides a current estimate of the expected future value of the option assuming that the underlying assumptions of the model are valid.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There has been an debate as to whether Black–Scholes is the appropriate way to measure the value of an option granted to an executive (Lambert et al ., ; Hall and Murphy, , ; Henderson et al ., ). The Black–Scholes method provides a current estimate of the expected future value of the option assuming that the underlying assumptions of the model are valid.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…18 As such it represents the value the firm assigns to executive talent. and Murphy, , 2002Henderson et al, 2013). The Black-Scholes method provides a current estimate of the expected future value of the option assuming that the underlying assumptions of the model are valid.…”
Section: Estimating Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%