2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10551-017-3586-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Executives’ Behaviour and Innovation in Corporate Governance: The Case of Internet Voting at Shareholders’ General Meetings in French Listed Companies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This development could contribute to the alignment of companies' interests with those of shareholders. Inter voting may result in loss of control [37]. However, Overall, the case is that the introduction of Internet voting somewhat reverses the relationship between shareholders and executives about corporate governance.…”
Section: Annual Generating Votingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This development could contribute to the alignment of companies' interests with those of shareholders. Inter voting may result in loss of control [37]. However, Overall, the case is that the introduction of Internet voting somewhat reverses the relationship between shareholders and executives about corporate governance.…”
Section: Annual Generating Votingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different from the existing studies that mostly focus on the shareholder governance effect of the large shareholders or the actual controllers (Xiao et al , 2020; Gao et al , 2020), this paper mainly studies the governance effect of noncontrolling shareholders in the collusive behavior of large shareholders and the management of the target company. Some scholars find that in addition to the supervision mechanism, noncontrolling shareholders may play a role in corporate governance by appointing directors in the board of directors to raise objections, so as to inhibit the self-interest behavior of controlling shareholders and the opportunistic behavior of the management (Jiang, 2015a; Cheffi and Abdennadher, 2019). Zeng et al (2018) reveal that the shareholding of institutional investors may restrain the encroachment intention of the controlling shareholder, which is beneficial for corporate governance.…”
Section: Additional Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, this study adopts a distinctive approach to analyse the determinants of employees innovative behaviour in the hotels industry, by proposing and empirically testing an integrated model, with contributions from well-grounded theories, namely the institutional theory and the fit theory. These theories have received substantial empirical support in explaining innovative behaviour (e.g., Cheffi and Abdennadher, 2019;Engelen et al, 2018;Fuentelsaz et al, 2018;Geels, 2004;Laukkanen and Patala, 2014). The proposed model seeks to take advantage of the validity, parsimony and reliability that these theories provide as determinants of innovative behaviour in order to improve explanatory and predictive power.…”
Section: Institutional Theory and Innovative Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%