“…For our analysis, we classified mid-term studies as having at least two data collection points during two sequential pandemic learning terms (i.e., Aparicio-Chueca et al, 2023;Azorín, 2020;Cobo-Rendon et al, 2021;Holzmann-Littig et al, 2022;Jandrić et al, 2021;Lobos et al, 2022;Moorhouse & Kohnke, 2021;Nabe-Nielsen, 2022;Nikolopoulou & Kousloglou, 2022;Oliveira et al, 2022;Tulaskar & Turunen, 2022;Stewart, Baek et al, 2022;Yagmur & Koksal, 2022). There were four "long-term" studies that ultimately had one pre-COVID and two COVID data points (see Garcia et al, 2021;Reuter et al, 2021;Sevimli, 2023;Whittaker & Pearson, 2021) that we ultimately considered as mid-term studies given our focus on longitudinal data only during COVID. Based on these studies, we present the following claims, grounds, and warrants.…”