2012
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(12)60479-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exenatide twice daily versus glimepiride for prevention of glycaemic deterioration in patients with type 2 diabetes with metformin failure (EUREXA): an open-label, randomised controlled trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
115
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 137 publications
(120 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
115
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…However, exenatide resulted in significant weight reduction while SUs were weight neutral or resulted in weight gain [Derosa et al 2010[Derosa et al , 2011. Exenatide also demonstrated greater durability than glimepiride with fewer treatment failures (41% versus 54%) and longer duration before treatment failure (180 weeks versus 142 weeks) when added to metformin [Gallwitz et al 2012 [Pratley et al 2010]. In a 1-year extension of this trial, liraglutide maintained significant reductions in HbA1c, FBG, and body weight over sitagliptin [Pratley et al 2011].…”
Section: Short-acting Glp-1 Rasmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…However, exenatide resulted in significant weight reduction while SUs were weight neutral or resulted in weight gain [Derosa et al 2010[Derosa et al , 2011. Exenatide also demonstrated greater durability than glimepiride with fewer treatment failures (41% versus 54%) and longer duration before treatment failure (180 weeks versus 142 weeks) when added to metformin [Gallwitz et al 2012 [Pratley et al 2010]. In a 1-year extension of this trial, liraglutide maintained significant reductions in HbA1c, FBG, and body weight over sitagliptin [Pratley et al 2011].…”
Section: Short-acting Glp-1 Rasmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The NICE approach also may underestimate the risks of hypoglycemia and weight gain with sulfonylureas and risks of heart failure and fractures with glitazones. GLP-1 RAs, apart from producing durable and clinically meaningful reduction in HbA 1c , have several other advantages such as promotion of weight loss, reduction of blood pressure, and a favorable safety profile (with the exception of nausea and vomiting that wane with time) and may be beneficial at an earlier stage in the therapeutic algorithm (10,26,32,33,37, [76][77][78][79][80]. While some of the clinical trial data as well as the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE) algorithm support early use of GLP-1 RAs, this may not be the preferred approach for all patients owing to high cost and the nature of injection therapy.…”
Section: Sglt2i: Adverse Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 Newer classes of antidiabetic agents (thiazolidinediones, 17 GLP-1 agonists 18 or SGLT2 inhibitors 19 ) appear to have a more durable effect on HbA1c than SUs, however, implying superior long-term control of glycaemia.…”
Section: Durability Of Actionmentioning
confidence: 99%