This article refers to 'Exercise haemodynamics may unmask the diagnosis of diastolic dysfunction among patients with pulmonary hypertension' by E. Maor et al., published in this issue on page 151The diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFPEF) remains challenging. A correct diagnosis requires the presence of signs or symptoms of congestion, normal LV systolic function, and evidence of diastolic LV dysfunction.1 Failure to establish the diagnosis of HFPEF correctly can be related to omission of evidence of diastolic LV dysfunction, 2 to exclusive reliance on elevated natriuretic peptides, 3 which are only modestly raised in HFPEF, 4 and to the fortuitous presence of a hypovolaemic status at the time of diagnostic evaluation, 5 which necessitates a repeat assessment during exercise 6 or saline infusion. 7 The latter was convincingly demonstrated in the current issue of the journal by the study of Maor et al., who performed a limited upper body exercise stress test mimicking daily living activities during right heart catheterization in patients with pulmonary hypertension (PHT) [mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) >25 mmHg] and normal resting pulmonary artery wedge pressure (PAWP <15 mmHg).
8Despite attaining a rise in heart rate of 10%, which was only 62% of the age-predicted maximal heart rate, one-third of the patients had a substantial rise of PAWP from 11.4 ± 3.3 to 28.0 ± 6.5 mmHg. Without exercise stress testing, their HFPEF-induced post-capillary (group 2) PHT would have remained unnoticed and these patients would have been erroneously classified as pre-capillary (group 1) PHT in accordance with the Dana Point PHT criteria. 9 Significant predictors of an exercise-induced rise in PAWP were a borderline resting PAWP (12 < PAWP < 15 mmHg), a high body mass index (BMI), presence of obesity, and a dilated left atrium.