Exercise Hemodynamics and Quality of Life after Aortic Valve Replacement for Aortic Stenosis in the Elderly Using the Hancock II Bioprosthesis

Long, Theodore; Lopez, Becky; Berberian, Christopher E.; Cunningham, Mark J.; Starnes, Vaughn A.; Cohen, Robbin G.

doi:10.1155/2014/151282

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 21 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…One study comparing preoperative and 6 th month postoperative quality of life using SF-36 in patients with a mean age of over 70 undergoing AVR reported positive changes at the 6 th month in physical functioning, social functioning, physical health-related task restriction, vitality, and health status. That same study also stated that functional capacity decreased from NYHA class 3 to class 1 in 82% of patients [ 11 ] .…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 86%

Comparison of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement to Improve Quality of Life in Patients >70 Years of Age with Severe Aortic Stenosis

Kocaaslan

Ketencі

Yılmaz

et al. 2015

Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective:Transcatheter aortic valve implantation has recently been used in the treatment of severe aortic valve stenosis, particularly in patients with high mortality and morbidity rates for open surgery. The purpose of this study was to compare quality of life in patients over 70 years of age undergoing surgical or transcatheter aortic valve implantation, before the procedure and in the early post-procedural period.Methods:Seventy-nine patients were included in the study, 38 (48.1%) male and 41 (51.9%) female. Mean age of patients was 74.3±5.2 (70-91) years. The surgical aortic valve replacement group consisted of 51 (64.6%) patients and the transcatheter aortic valve replacement group of 28 (35.4%). Quality of life data before the procedure and at the 3rd month postoperatively in patients aged 70 years and older undergoing surgical or transcatheter aortic valve implantation were assessed using the 36-item Short Form Health Survey form.Results:Positive increases in physical task difficulty (13.2±9.8 vs. 5.1±7.3) (P=0.001), emotional task difficulty (14.4±11.9 vs. 8.5±6.4) (P=0.035), and mental health (0.4±10.4 vs. 9.6±15.1) (P=0.001; P<0.01) scores in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement were significantly higher compared to the surgical aortic valve replacement group. No statistically significant difference was determined between the groups in terms of pain, vitality, social function, physical function or general health scores in the preoperative and postoperative periods.Conclusion:The positive increase in quality of life parameters in the transcatheter aortic valve implantation group at the 3rd month postoperatively was significantly higher compared to the surgical aortic valve replacement group.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 86%

Comparison of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement to Improve Quality of Life in Patients >70 Years of Age with Severe Aortic Stenosis

Kocaaslan

Ketencі

Yılmaz

et al. 2015

Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Non-coronary Interventions in the Elderly

Birkemeyer¹

2015

Interventional Cardiology in the Elderly

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Comparative Analysis of the Quality of Life of Patients Depending on the Method of Aortic Stenosis Correction: Tavi Versus Savr With a Biological Prosthesis

Todurov,

Zelenchuk,

Khokhlov

et al. 2024

EUMJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction. The impact of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVI) on health-related quality of life (QoL) is critical, especially for elderly patients who often prioritize quality of life over duration, but the QoL benefits of this technique have been largely unexplored . The purpose of this work was to conduct a comparative analysis of the quality of life of patients after correction of aortic valve stenosis using TAVI and surgical aortic valve prosthetics with a biological prosthesis. Materials and methods. Adult patients (over 18 years of age) who underwent primary surgical or transcatheter aortic valve replacement at the State Institution "Heart Institute of the Ministry of Health" between 2018 and 2022 are included in the study. Quality of life was assessed using the Medical Outcome Study Short Form-36 (SF-36) questionnaire one day before and 6 months after the procedure. The results. The study included 72 patients, of whom TAVI was performed in 47 (65.3 %) cases and SAVR with a biological prosthesis in 25 (34.7 %) cases. Patients with TAVI were older (p = 0.007) and characterized by a significantly higher level of operative risk according to EuroSCORE II (p < 0.001) compared to patients with SAVR. In TAVI patients, there was a significant improvement in all SF-36 parameters in the postoperative period compared to baseline values (p < 0.05), while parameters such as pain (p = 0.917) and mental health (p = 0.053 ) were not significantly different compared to baseline values in patients with SAVR biological prosthesis. Conclusions. The results of the assessment of the quality of life in the TAVI group at the end of the 6th month were characterized by a reliable increase in all indicators according to the SF-36 questionnaire, while in patients with SAVR, the dynamics of two indicators, such as mental health and pain, were recorded as unreliable.

show abstract

Exercise Hemodynamics and Quality of Life after Aortic Valve Replacement for Aortic Stenosis in the Elderly Using the Hancock II Bioprosthesis

Cited by 3 publications

References 21 publications

Comparison of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement to Improve Quality of Life in Patients >70 Years of Age with Severe Aortic Stenosis

Comparison of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement to Improve Quality of Life in Patients >70 Years of Age with Severe Aortic Stenosis

Non-coronary Interventions in the Elderly

Comparative Analysis of the Quality of Life of Patients Depending on the Method of Aortic Stenosis Correction: Tavi Versus Savr With a Biological Prosthesis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About