1999
DOI: 10.1136/bjsm.33.2.79
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exercise in cardiac rehabilitation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 119 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Low levels of patient participation and completion (14–43% after MI) have been reported in Australia, France, the United Kingdom, and New Zealand with high levels of dropout after enrollment [ 13 – 17 ]. Lack of completion reduces the benefits of CR, such as improvements in CVD risk factors [ 18 ]. Patient-oriented, medical, and healthcare system factors associated with suboptimal participation include availability, affordability and accessibility of a program, as well as work/domestic commitments and psychological barriers [ 19 , 20 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Low levels of patient participation and completion (14–43% after MI) have been reported in Australia, France, the United Kingdom, and New Zealand with high levels of dropout after enrollment [ 13 – 17 ]. Lack of completion reduces the benefits of CR, such as improvements in CVD risk factors [ 18 ]. Patient-oriented, medical, and healthcare system factors associated with suboptimal participation include availability, affordability and accessibility of a program, as well as work/domestic commitments and psychological barriers [ 19 , 20 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sustaining habitual physical activity participation is necessary following cardiac rehabilitation completion to maintain the associated health benefits. However, findings indicate that many patients do not maintain physical activity participation following programme completion [ 9 12 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The participation rate for the CR program has increased recently; however, the rate is still low despite evidence that participation in a CR program confers clinically significant benefits for patients diagnosed with cardiovascular disease [ 16 ]. One of the main reasons for low attendance is that especially the patients with low LVEF and poor cardiopulmonary function do not actively participate because of misconceptions such as CR is not safe and is relatively contraindicated; therefore, not beneficial [ 17 ]. However, findings of recent studies support the claim that patients with poor cardiopulmonary function and reduced LVEF are no longer a contraindication to CR nowadays and attending a CR program more actively has a positive effect on long-term mortality [ 18 19 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%