2013
DOI: 10.2340/16501977-1112
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exercise self-efficacy in persons with spinal cord injury: Psychometric properties of the Dutch translation of the Exercise Self-Efficacy Scale

Abstract: The results of this study support the use of the ESES as a reliable and valid measure of exercise self-efficacy.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These data agree with those of Brazilian statistics regarding the gender and age group with the highest incidence of spinal cord injury. 10,29 As in the Dutch version, 22 the Brazilian version of the ESES, included a larger number of individuals with SCI of traumatic etiology, with predominance of lesions in the thoracic or lumbar segments. This predominance of individuals with paraplegia caused by trauma contrasts with what is indicated by the statistics for both Brazil and other countries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…These data agree with those of Brazilian statistics regarding the gender and age group with the highest incidence of spinal cord injury. 10,29 As in the Dutch version, 22 the Brazilian version of the ESES, included a larger number of individuals with SCI of traumatic etiology, with predominance of lesions in the thoracic or lumbar segments. This predominance of individuals with paraplegia caused by trauma contrasts with what is indicated by the statistics for both Brazil and other countries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Brazilian version of the ESES, as well as the original 21 and Dutch 22 versions, presented good internal consistency. In the original version, Cronbach's alpha for a single application of the ESES was 0.87.…”
Section: Icc (Random Effect -One Factor)mentioning
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations