2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.aaen.2006.12.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exercising restraint: Clinical, legal and ethical considerations for the patient with Alzheimer’s disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nursing staff may need to restrain a patient in order to protect the patient from injury, or protect him or her from unnecessary risk or harm. Also patients have a right to be free from physical restraint except in an emergency or when isolation or restraint is a part of a treatment program (McBrien, 2007).…”
Section: Proponents Of Physical Restraint Usementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nursing staff may need to restrain a patient in order to protect the patient from injury, or protect him or her from unnecessary risk or harm. Also patients have a right to be free from physical restraint except in an emergency or when isolation or restraint is a part of a treatment program (McBrien, 2007).…”
Section: Proponents Of Physical Restraint Usementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specific recommendations are presented such as encouragement of oral fluids, analgesic strategies, and clear, disability‐related toilet signage. Physical restraints are described as a last resort but outlined in the list of options for management in another study …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A single study that asked patients about their perceptions of physical restraint, focused on the cognitively intact [37]. People with cognitive impairment can have periods of lucidity and competence, and where this is not the case, a proxy decision maker should be involved in any decision making [42].…”
Section: Autonomymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increases in medical litigation are a source of distress to all caring for patients, especially older people and those with cognitive impairment who may be at risk of injury [42]. Physical restraint is sometimes applied due to fear of litigation [28].…”
Section: Legal Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%