2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2010.09.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exergetic comparison of two different cooling technologies for the power cycle of a thermal power plant

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, it is necessary to supply substantially more air than water to provide the same thermal capacity for heat removal from the condenser, which is accompanied by a large parasitic fan power requirement. Blanco-Marigorta et al (2011) found that with a steam condensation temperature of 37°C, this results in an exergetic efficiency of just 26% for an air cooled condenser, compared to 63% for a wet condenser. This thermal capacity difference results in ACCs requiring a higher initial temperature difference (ITD = T steam,in -T air,in ) than water cooling systems with cost-effective designs.…”
Section: Air-cooled Condenser Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, it is necessary to supply substantially more air than water to provide the same thermal capacity for heat removal from the condenser, which is accompanied by a large parasitic fan power requirement. Blanco-Marigorta et al (2011) found that with a steam condensation temperature of 37°C, this results in an exergetic efficiency of just 26% for an air cooled condenser, compared to 63% for a wet condenser. This thermal capacity difference results in ACCs requiring a higher initial temperature difference (ITD = T steam,in -T air,in ) than water cooling systems with cost-effective designs.…”
Section: Air-cooled Condenser Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The required heat for the first cell is provided either by a solar field composed of static compound parabolic collectors (CPC) and a storage system composed of two tanks of 24 m 3 capacity or by a double-effect absorption heat pump (DEAPH; using LiBr-H 2 O as absorption fluid) manufactured by Entropie in 2005 as part of the AQUASOL project framework. Assessment of the MED plant driven by hot water as the thermal energy source gave a PR of between 10.5 and 11, with a TBT of 64-67 C. These conditions were the most optimal for the first-effect tube bundle (Blanco et al 2011). Figure 1.8 shows the components of the AQUASOL system at the PSA.…”
Section: Multi-effect Distillationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exergy analysis has been applied in various power studies [24][25][26]. Exergetic analysis for a regenerative Brayton cycle with isothermal heat addition and isentropic compressor and turbine [27] is available.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%