2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.118151
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental analyses of an integrated SOFC-GT-ORC hybrid system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ghorbani et al. ( Ghorbani et al., 2020 ) employed the ecoindicator 99 to apportion environmental impact points to exergy streams in an integrated system comprising a solid-oxide fuel cell, a gas turbine, and an ORC. Here too, the ORC recovers heat from the gas turbine power plant to generate additional power.…”
Section: Exergy-based Life Cycle Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ghorbani et al. ( Ghorbani et al., 2020 ) employed the ecoindicator 99 to apportion environmental impact points to exergy streams in an integrated system comprising a solid-oxide fuel cell, a gas turbine, and an ORC. Here too, the ORC recovers heat from the gas turbine power plant to generate additional power.…”
Section: Exergy-based Life Cycle Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the exergy destruction rate for a system in the steady-state process, the exergy rates associated with heat and power can be expressed in steady flow as follows [ 46 ]: …”
Section: Thermodynamic Economic and Environmental Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…C denotes the cost rate and  Z refers to the rate of capital or maintenance cost associated with each component. Cost rate is given by [50,51]:…”
Section: Exergoeconomic Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%