2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2016.12.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exergoeconomic, enviroeconomic and productivity analyses of basin type solar stills by incorporating N identical PVT compound parabolic concentrator collectors: A comparative study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, care must be taken during the design process of SS, especially in the MSSs, to reduce the thermal energy losses by using prober insulations with lower thermal conductivity. 21 The diurnal exergy efficiencies of the CSS components, i.e., the basin liner, the glazier cover and the saline water, are 11.89%, 17.66% and 63.61%, respectively; these values are increased for the CuO nanofluid still and reach 13.40%, 23.18% and 80.83% for the basin liner, the glazier and the saline water, respectively. Moreover, these values are increased for the graphite nanofluid still and reach 12.32%, 23.76% and 93.35% for the basin liner, the glazier cover and the saline water, respectively, as shown in Fig.5-b.…”
Section: Exergy Dissipation and Exergy Efficiency In Still Componentsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, care must be taken during the design process of SS, especially in the MSSs, to reduce the thermal energy losses by using prober insulations with lower thermal conductivity. 21 The diurnal exergy efficiencies of the CSS components, i.e., the basin liner, the glazier cover and the saline water, are 11.89%, 17.66% and 63.61%, respectively; these values are increased for the CuO nanofluid still and reach 13.40%, 23.18% and 80.83% for the basin liner, the glazier and the saline water, respectively. Moreover, these values are increased for the graphite nanofluid still and reach 12.32%, 23.76% and 93.35% for the basin liner, the glazier cover and the saline water, respectively, as shown in Fig.5-b.…”
Section: Exergy Dissipation and Exergy Efficiency In Still Componentsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Due to low yield of the SSs, many investigators introduced several scrupulous designs to enhance the output by enhance the evaporation rate of water. Researchers suggested different designs to improve the SSs' performance, such as double slope [3], stepped SS [4,5], SS with phase change materials (PCMs) [6][7][8][9] wick SS [ 10 -12 ] , hybrid SS [13][14][15], stepped SS with continual water circulation [ 3 ] , wind speed [16], SS with storage materials [17,18], SS with nanoparticles [19], SS with PV/T [20][21][22] , and SS with vertical ripple surface [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same method has been used by several authors in similar studies dealing with exergy analysis of solar stills with PCMs as thermal storage [62][63][64]. This process of exergy of a system is irreversible due to the generated entropy and the exergy can only be preserved if the process is reversed.…”
Section: Solar Stillsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cogeneration efficiency ( η cog ) is given as, 31,32 ηcog=italicNet0.25emitalicelectrical energy+italicUseful thermal energySolar energy input to the system …”
Section: Cogeneration Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%