2013
DOI: 10.5433/1679-0359.2013v34n4p1945
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exigência de lisina digestível para a tilápia-do-Nilo de 87 a 226 g alimentada com dietas balanceadas para a relação arginina: lisina

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
1
5

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
9
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Lysine requirements for Nile tilapia show different results than those estimated in this study to optimize weight gain (1.73%). It was higher than those determined by Furuya et al (2004), for fish in the 5.34 to 77.26 g stage, which estimated the lysine level at 1.42%; by Furuya et al (2013) for fish in the 87 to 226 g stage, fed diets balanced for arginine:lysine ratio, which estimated the requirement to be 1.31% digestible lysine; and by Furuya et al (2006) with juveniles (5.72 to 35.05 g), which determined the requirement to be 1.56% digestible lysine. On the other hand, the result of the present study was similar to that determined by Bomfim et al (2010), working with fingerlings (1.12 g), which estimated 1.70% digestible lysine as the minimum level to obtain the optimum weight gain; and was lower than that found for Nile tilapia fingerlings (0.98 g) by Takishita et al (2009), who estimated the requirement to be 2.17% digestible lysine, both using the ideal protein concept in the formulation of experimental feed.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…Lysine requirements for Nile tilapia show different results than those estimated in this study to optimize weight gain (1.73%). It was higher than those determined by Furuya et al (2004), for fish in the 5.34 to 77.26 g stage, which estimated the lysine level at 1.42%; by Furuya et al (2013) for fish in the 87 to 226 g stage, fed diets balanced for arginine:lysine ratio, which estimated the requirement to be 1.31% digestible lysine; and by Furuya et al (2006) with juveniles (5.72 to 35.05 g), which determined the requirement to be 1.56% digestible lysine. On the other hand, the result of the present study was similar to that determined by Bomfim et al (2010), working with fingerlings (1.12 g), which estimated 1.70% digestible lysine as the minimum level to obtain the optimum weight gain; and was lower than that found for Nile tilapia fingerlings (0.98 g) by Takishita et al (2009), who estimated the requirement to be 2.17% digestible lysine, both using the ideal protein concept in the formulation of experimental feed.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…Some Authors suggest that the arginina: lisina ratio imbalace may affect animal performace (Furuya et al, 2012;Dairiki et al, 2013). The same can be observed in the study of Furuya et al (2013) who utilized 1.43:1 arginina: lisina ratio in the diet for tilápia (O. niloticus) and found that ratio to have influenced the lysine requirement when compared to earlier studies undertaken with the same species, suggesting that ratio to be able to affect the animal's nutritional need. In the present study, the highest and lowest arginine: lysine ratios showed to be 1.45:1 and 0.65:1 respectively, yet, the best zootechnical parameter values for tambaqui were observed with the 0.87:1 ratio, near to values (0.98:1 and 0.91:1) observed by Furuya et al (2006) for the best weight gain with tilápia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…(2006) (2013) obtained the 5% lysine in the protein requirement for dory (S. brasilienses). Dairiki et al (2007) estimated the lysine requirement for the carnivorous "blackbass" (Micropterussalmoides) at 1,69% dietary lysine or 3.9% of the protein and Furuya et al (2013) determined the digestible lysine requirement for the Nile tilapia at 1.31% dietary lysine, maintaining the arginine: lysine ratio constant. Table 8.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This condition was verified in the present study and showed differences among the levels of L-lysine supplementation in the diet. Other studies reported less accumulation of fat in fish fed diets with different levels of L-lysine in Oncorhynchus mykiss (Encarnação et al, 2004); Cyprinus carpio (Zhou et al, 2008); P. mesopotamicus (Abimorad et al, 2010); Oreochromis niloticus (Furuya et al, 2013). The reduction in visceral fat may have occurred due to the fact that L-lysine acts as a precursor of carnitine, which is involved in the transport of long-chain fatty acids to the mitochondria (Zhou et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%