2019
DOI: 10.3934/cpaa.2019110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Existence and decay property of ground state solutions for Hamiltonian elliptic system

Abstract: In this paper we study the following nonlinear Hamiltonian elliptic system with gradient term −∆u + b(x) • ∇u + u + V (x)v = f (x, |z|)v, x ∈ R N , −∆v − b(x) • ∇v + v + V (x)u = f (x, |z|)u, x ∈ R N , where z = (u, v) ∈ R 2. Under some suitable conditions on the potential and nonlinearity, we obtain the existence of ground state solutions in periodic case and asymptotically periodic case via variational methods, respectively. Moreover, we also explore some properties of these ground state solutions, such as c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(60 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We would like to point out that the global super-quadratic (SQ) is indispensable in verifying the linking geometry structure and constructing Cerami sequence by the diagonal method and linking argument, see [37,40]. Unfortunately, in the present paper we have no global information on the nonlinearity like (SQ), then the non-Nehari manifold method seems not work to our problem under the local super-quaratic condition.…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We would like to point out that the global super-quadratic (SQ) is indispensable in verifying the linking geometry structure and constructing Cerami sequence by the diagonal method and linking argument, see [37,40]. Unfortunately, in the present paper we have no global information on the nonlinearity like (SQ), then the non-Nehari manifold method seems not work to our problem under the local super-quaratic condition.…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Since gµ(x, s) is increasing in s on ( , +∞) due to (f ), we can obtain Gµ(x, t) ≤ for t ≥ by using some arguments in [37,40]. So, we get the rst conclusion from the above formula.…”
Section: The Perturbation Problemmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…see [24,35,39,40,43]. For this case, since the appearance of the gradient term in system, system (1.1) has some di erences and di culties compared with the case b(x) = .…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%