2018
DOI: 10.1214/18-ejp204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Existence and uniqueness of reflecting diffusions in cusps

Abstract: We consider stochastic differential equations with (oblique) reflection in a 2-dimensional domain that has a cusp at the origin, i..e. in a neighborhood of the origin has the formGiven a vector field γ of directions of reflection at the boundary points other than the origin, defining directions of reflection at the origin γ i (0) := lim x 1 →0 + γ(x 1 , ψ i (x 1 )), i = 1, 2, and assuming there exists a vector e * such that e * , γ i (0) > 0, i = 1, 2, and e * 1 > 0, we prove weak existence and uniqueness of t… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because of that our paper may be seen as an invitation for future analysis of the thin layer approximation in the context of stochastic processes. Perhaps stochastic analysis, and the results presented in [28,58] in particular, may lead to generalizations that are also meaningful in this field.…”
Section: Comparison With the Existing Literaturementioning
confidence: 98%
“…Because of that our paper may be seen as an invitation for future analysis of the thin layer approximation in the context of stochastic processes. Perhaps stochastic analysis, and the results presented in [28,58] in particular, may lead to generalizations that are also meaningful in this field.…”
Section: Comparison With the Existing Literaturementioning
confidence: 98%
“…Clearly, every solution of the constrained martingale problem is also a solution of the submartingale problem. This approach, or the corresponding one for stochastic equations, has been used, for example, in [10,5,7]. Whether the submartingale problem approach or the constrained martingale problem approach is used, the critical issue is uniqueness of the solution, which is still an open question for many examples (see e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The assertion follows essentially from Condition 3.3(iv). The proof is analogous to that of Lemma 4.2 of Costantini and Kurtz (2018) and Lemma 6.4 of Taylor and Williams (1993).…”
Section: Formulation Of the Problem And Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…In particular, we replace the application of the Krein-Rutman theorem in Kwon and Williams (1991) by the inhomogeneous ergodic theorem of Section 2. In turn, some of the estimates we need to apply our probabilistic results exploit some analytical results of Kwon and Williams (1991) and a result proved in Appendix A1, together with the coupling result of Lemma 5.3 of Costantini and Kurtz (2018). Another essential ingredient of our arguments is that, in order to prove uniqueness of the solution of the constrained martingale problem for (A, D, B, Ξ), it is enough to prove uniqueness among strong Markov, natural solutions (Costantini and Kurtz (2019)).…”
Section: Outline Of the Proof Of Uniquenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation