2019
DOI: 10.2298/fil1917561s
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Existence, blow-up and exponential decay estimates for the nonlinear Kirchhoff-Carrier wave equation in an annular with nonhomogeneous Dirichlet conditions

Abstract: This paper is devoted to the study of a nonlinear Kirchhoff-Carrier wave equation in an annular associated with nonhomogeneous Dirichlet conditions. At first, by applying the Faedo-Galerkin, we prove existence and uniqueness of the solution of the problem considered. Next, by constructing Lyapunov functional, we prove a blow-up result for solutions with a negative initial energy and establish a sufficient condition to obtain the exponential decay of weak solutions.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the proofs, we use the multiplier technique combined with a suitable Lyapunov functional. Our results can be regarded as an extension and improvement of the corresponding results of [7], [10] - [12], [18] - [22], [28], [29].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…In the proofs, we use the multiplier technique combined with a suitable Lyapunov functional. Our results can be regarded as an extension and improvement of the corresponding results of [7], [10] - [12], [18] - [22], [28], [29].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…By giving corrections to the energy functionals E(t) and I(t) as above, with adding the functional (g * u)(t), we also have suitable corrections to our papers. [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] Note more that, in case of the problem considered containing the term ∫ t 0 g(t − s)Δu(x, s)ds, we onlygive corrections to the functional I(t) with adding the term ∫ t 0 g(t − s) ‖∇u(t) − ∇u(s)‖ 2 ds in the definition of I(t), where, for example, u ∈ C 0 ( R + ; H 1 0…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ð38Þ By ( 35)-(37), we get (32). And by using Young's inequality, ( 14), (16), and ( 17) in (38), we obtain (33). Now, we define the functional…”
Section: Blow Upmentioning
confidence: 99%