2022
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2105867119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Existence of equilibria in repeated games with long-run payoffs

Abstract: Significance Nash equilibrium, of central importance in strategic game theory, exists in all finite games. Here we prove that it exists also in all infinitely repeated games, with a finite or countably infinite set of players, in which the payoff function is bounded and measurable and the payoff depends only on what is played in the long run, i.e., not on what is played in any fixed finite number of stages. To this end we combine techniques from stochastic games with techniques from alternating-move … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Remark 3.4. If s is an absorbing state, then by Ashkenazi-Golan, Flesch, Predtetchinski, and Solan [1], there exists an ε-equilibrium for the initial state s, for every ε > 0. Hence, by Assumption 3.3, (i) a state s is absorbing if and only there exists an ε-equilibrium for the initial state s, for every ε > 0, and (ii) once the run reaches an absorbing state, the payoffs do not depend on the continuation of the run.…”
Section: Our Next Assumption Corresponds Tomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Remark 3.4. If s is an absorbing state, then by Ashkenazi-Golan, Flesch, Predtetchinski, and Solan [1], there exists an ε-equilibrium for the initial state s, for every ε > 0. Hence, by Assumption 3.3, (i) a state s is absorbing if and only there exists an ε-equilibrium for the initial state s, for every ε > 0, and (ii) once the run reaches an absorbing state, the payoffs do not depend on the continuation of the run.…”
Section: Our Next Assumption Corresponds Tomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The function D δ i is in essence a strategy of player I in this auxiliary game such that this strategy is winning in each subgame. For a precise exposition, we refer to Ashkenazi-Golan, Flesch, Predtetchinski, and Solan [1]; properties (2)-( 4) directly follow from their lemma, whereas property (1) follows from their construction. The extension to a finite state space S is carried out in Flesch and Solan [19].…”
Section: Subgame-perfect δ-Maxmin Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Remark 5.4 The proof method above can be slightly adjusted to show that Theorem 2.3 holds even if the number of players is countably infinite, see Ashkenazi-Golan, Flesch, Predtetchinski, Solan (2022a). Since this involves more technical details on the measuretheoretic foundation of the model and the results, we only briefly discuss how the method can be applied.…”
Section: Third Proof: Acceptable Strategy Profilesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the winning set is not Borel-measurable, the game is not always determined. Blackwell (1969) studied analogous games where the two players move simultaneously: in every stage both players simultaneously choose actions, and player 1 wins if and only and Solan (2022aSolan ( , 2022b, the fourth proof is new.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%