2016
DOI: 10.4310/cag.2016.v24.n1.a5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Existence of isoperimetric regions in non-compact Riemannian manifolds under Ricci or scalar curvature conditions

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
52
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Let us briefly comment on the relevance of Corollary 1.3 despite the triviality of its proof. Recall that, from the note of Christodoulou and Yau [5], if (M, g) has non negative scalar curvature then isoperimetric spheres (and more generally stable CMC spheres) have positive Hawking mass; on the other hand it is known (see for instance [6] or [28]) that, if M is compact, then small isoperimetric regions converge to geodesic spheres centered at a maximum point of the scalar curvature as the enclosed volume converges to 0 (see also [22] for the non-compact case). Therefore a link between regions with positive Hawking mass and critical points of the scalar curvature was already present in literature, but Corollary 1.3 expresses this link precisely.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let us briefly comment on the relevance of Corollary 1.3 despite the triviality of its proof. Recall that, from the note of Christodoulou and Yau [5], if (M, g) has non negative scalar curvature then isoperimetric spheres (and more generally stable CMC spheres) have positive Hawking mass; on the other hand it is known (see for instance [6] or [28]) that, if M is compact, then small isoperimetric regions converge to geodesic spheres centered at a maximum point of the scalar curvature as the enclosed volume converges to 0 (see also [22] for the non-compact case). Therefore a link between regions with positive Hawking mass and critical points of the scalar curvature was already present in literature, but Corollary 1.3 expresses this link precisely.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is known that mild bounded geometry implies weak bounded geometry, but the converse is not true. For more details about this point the reader is referred to Remark 2.5 of [MN16] and to the references therein. Definition 2.3.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore Theorem 1.1 in particular implies that P(B r (x 0 )) ≤ P R n (B R n (V )), but is a strictly stronger statement which at best of our knowledge is original. The aforementioned counterpart of Theorem 1.1 for the isoperimetric problem was proved instead by Morgan-Johnson [43,Theorem 3.5] for compact manifolds and extended to non-compact manifolds in [42,Proposition 3.2].…”
Section: 3)mentioning
confidence: 99%