2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3800(00)00442-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Existence of limit cycles for predator–prey systems with a class of functional responses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

2
20
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this paper, we continue our previous work in Hesaaraki et al [6], on the existence of limit cycles for a predator-prey system with a given functional response. In this study, we will give some conditions for the nonexistence of limit cycles for a class of functional responses.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 59%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this paper, we continue our previous work in Hesaaraki et al [6], on the existence of limit cycles for a predator-prey system with a given functional response. In this study, we will give some conditions for the nonexistence of limit cycles for a class of functional responses.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Following Kooij et al [10], Sugie [15] presented a sufficient and necessary condition under which the system (1.1) with Ivlev's functional response has a unique limit cycle. This problem is also considered in [6] for a more general case and the necessary and sufficient condition for the existence of limit cycles under the assumption ' 000 ðxÞ > 0 is given. Hesaaraki et al [4] presented a sufficient and necessary condition for the nonexistence of limit cycles of (1.1) when the functional response is x n =ða þ x n Þ, a > 0, n > 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Sufficient and necessary conditions for the uniqueness of limit cycles of system (1) have been presented in Sugie et al (1997), when the functional response is h(x) = x n x n +a , for a > 0 and n > 1. The general Gause type predation model has been widely studied, establishing the stability and bifurcations (Sugie et al 1996(Sugie et al , 1997, proving the global stability of the positive equilibrium point (Huang and Zhu 2005;Sugie and Katayama 1999), and demonstrating the uniqueness (Huang and Zhu 2005;Kuang and Freedman 1988;Moghadas and Corbett 2008;Wang and Sun 2007;Xiao and Zhang 2003) or nonexistence of limit cycles (Hesaaraki and Moghadas 1999;Sugie et al 1996). However, it is not an easy task to study the quantity of limit cycles that can be generated throughout the bifurcation of a center-focus (Chicone 2006).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theoretical studies show that models of population dynamics often exhibit high amplitude oscillations in the sizes of populations and communities. Continuous predator-prey models, for example, may exhibit neutrally stable equilibria (Lotka 1925) and limit cycles (Baalen et al 2001;Hesaaraki and Moghadas 2001;GonsalesOlivares et al 2006). Chaotic oscillations may be found in continuous three-trophic-level models of systems with omnivory (Tanabe and Namba 2005;Namba et al 2008), in discrete maps of consumer-resource systems (Hassel 1978), and in single density-dependent population models with discrete (non-overlapping) generations (May 1974(May , 1976May and Oster 1976;Nayfe and Balachandran 1995;Hanski 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%