2012
DOI: 10.1007/s00222-012-0409-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Existence of log canonical closures

Abstract: Let f : X → U be a projective morphism of normal varieties and (X, ∆) a dlt pair. We prove that if there is an open set U 0 ⊂ U , such that (X, ∆) × U U 0 has a good minimal model over U 0 and the images of all the non-klt centers intersect U 0 , then (X, ∆) has a good minimal model over U . As consequences we show the existence of log canonical compactifications for open log canonical pairs, and the fact that the moduli functor of stable schemes satisfies the valuative criterion for properness.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
104
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
104
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Theorem 1.2 (cf. [HX,Theorem 1.1]). Let π : X → Z be a projective morphism of normal quasi-projective varieties and let (X, ∆) be a log canonical pair with a boundary R-divisor ∆.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Theorem 1.2 (cf. [HX,Theorem 1.1]). Let π : X → Z be a projective morphism of normal quasi-projective varieties and let (X, ∆) be a log canonical pair with a boundary R-divisor ∆.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With Theorem 1.1 and Theorem 1.2, we can prove R-divisor versions of some results which are known in Q-boundary divisor case: Corollary 1.3 (existence of lc closures, cf. [HX,Corollary 1.2]). Let U 0 be an open subset of a normal quasi-projective variety U, f 0 : X 0 → U 0 be a projective morphism, and (X 0 , ∆ 0 ) be a log canonical pair.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although part of the MMP, including the abundance conjecture, remains to be conjectural, all the MMP results we need in this note are already proved in [BCHM10] and its extensions, e.g. [HX13].…”
Section: Dual Complexmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Up to replacing Z with a higher model and X with the normalization of the fiber product, by Chow's lemma, we may assume that Z is quasi-projective. Then, by [24], we may assume that Z is projective. Let X η be the geometric generic fiber.…”
Section: Generalized Adjunctionmentioning
confidence: 99%