2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10955-013-0801-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Existence of Nonequilibrium Steady State for a Simple Model of Heat Conduction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

6
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For any probability measure µ on R N + , lim δ→0 µP δ − µ T V = 0.Proof. This proof is identical to that of Lemma 5.6 of[37].…”
mentioning
confidence: 54%
“…For any probability measure µ on R N + , lim δ→0 µP δ − µ T V = 0.Proof. This proof is identical to that of Lemma 5.6 of[37].…”
mentioning
confidence: 54%
“…A second group consists of results for Hamiltonian models similar to those in [4], with additional assumptions or special features to make the problem more tractable (as noted earlier, Hamiltonian models are much harder), they include: [2,20], which prove ergodicity of the invariant measure assuming existence; [9], which proves existence and uniqueness for a model in which all energy exchanges are exclusively with 'thermostats' (or heat baths); and, [21], which treats a model with special geometry. A third group of results we know of consists of [10] and variants of this model [11,15]. As with the present study, models in this third group are stochastic versions of models with mechanical origin.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…But many non-rigorous results are available. For example, many recent studies [21,16,30] consider the Markov energy exchange models obtained from nonrigorous derivations in [14,13,15]. Also see [19] for a review of many numerical and analytical results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%