2021
DOI: 10.1002/jcd.21765
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Existence of strong difference families and constructions for eight new 2‐designs

Abstract: Using group rings and characters as in the theory of abelian difference sets, some nonexistence results for strong difference families are provided. Existences of strong difference families with base block size 3 ≤ k ≤ 9 are discussed. Via strong difference families, eight 2‐ ( v , k , λ ) designs whose existences were unknown are constructed for ( v , k , λ ) ∈ { ( 3417 , 8 , 1 ) , ( 3753 , 8 , 1 ) , ( 2665 , 9 , 1 ) , ( 3817 , 9 , 1 ) , ( 4393 , 9 , 1 ) , ( 7353 , 9 , 1 ) , ( 12537 , 9 , 1 ) , ( 345 , 9 , … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The concept of a strong difference family was introduced in [5] to provide constructions for relative difference families (see also [6], [10], [26]). Some work also had been done on strong difference families recently [11], [15], [16], [33]. In [2], a strong difference family was used to construct 3-pyramidal KTSs (Kirkman triple systems).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The concept of a strong difference family was introduced in [5] to provide constructions for relative difference families (see also [6], [10], [26]). Some work also had been done on strong difference families recently [11], [15], [16], [33]. In [2], a strong difference family was used to construct 3-pyramidal KTSs (Kirkman triple systems).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Appendix A (u, v, g, h) =(2,36,2,4) {(0,0), (1,14), (1,15), (1,26)}, {(0,0),(0,5),(0,15),(0, 19),(1,7)}, {(0,0),(0,2),(0,8),(1,13)}, {(0,0),(0,3), (1,4), (1,20), (1,33)}.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%